fedi so madembwe vs republic 2007 tzhc 89 27 april 2007
The appellant was sufficiently identified as the perpetrator, but there was no evidence of actual or threatened violence; therefore, the conviction for robbery with violence was quashed and substituted with assault with intent to steal under section 288 of the Penal Code.
- Citation
- fedi so madembwe vs republic 2007 tzhc 89 27 april 2007
- Parties
- Appellant: Fedi Madembwe; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
- Outcome
- conviction for robbery with violence quashed and substituted with conviction for assault with intent to steal; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Assault With Intent to Steal, Identification Evidence, Sentencing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fedi Madembwe
Appellant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal (high Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was properly identified as the perpetrator
- 2 Whether the offence involved actual or threatened violence
- 3 Whether the trial was conducted according to proper procedure
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant was sufficiently identified as the perpetrator, but there was no evidence of actual or threatened violence; therefore, the conviction for robbery with violence was quashed and substituted with assault with intent to steal under section 288 of the Penal Code.
Court Disposition
conviction for robbery with violence quashed and substituted with conviction for assault with intent to steal; sentence reduced
Orders
- Conviction for robbery with violence quashed
- Conviction for assault with intent to steal substituted under section 288 of the Penal Code
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment