felician andrea and another vs praxeda cosma 2021 tzhc 7314 29 october 2021
The appellants, having failed to appeal the Ward Tribunal's decision in time or object during execution proceedings, cannot challenge the execution order. The District Land and Housing Tribunal acted within its powers, and the appeal is without merit.
- Citation
- felician andrea and another vs praxeda cosma 2021 tzhc 7314 29 october 2021
- Parties
- Appellant: FELICIAN ANDREA; Appellant: REMIGIUS FELISIAN; Respondent: PRAXEDA COSMA
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Execution Order
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Execution of Judgment, Right of Appeal, Jurisdiction, Assessment of Tribunal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FELICIAN ANDREA
Appellant
REMIGIUS FELISIAN
Appellant
PRAXEDA COSMA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Execution Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Land and Housing Tribunal erred in allowing execution of the Ward Tribunal's decision
- 2 Whether the appellants were denied the right to be heard
- 3 Whether assessors' opinions were required in execution proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants, having failed to appeal the Ward Tribunal's decision in time or object during execution proceedings, cannot challenge the execution order. The District Land and Housing Tribunal acted within its powers, and the appeal is without merit.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Respondent to proceed with execution processes
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment