N
- Citation
- N
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Decision
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Decision
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appellate court found that the trial court erred by disregarding credible evidence of the appellant's contribution to the acquisition of the properties, including financial and non-financial input, and held that there was sufficient evidence to establish her entitlement to a share in the properties acquired during the union.
Court disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Appellant entitled to a share in the suit properties acquired during the union
- Matter remitted for division of property in accordance with the findings
02
Material facts
Parties
Fidelil Said
Appellant[Unnamed Respondent]
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Appellant's Claimed Contribution: KES 69,500
03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal / High Court Appellate Decision
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the appellant contributed to the acquisition of the suit properties during the union
- 02
Whether the trial court erred in its assessment of evidence regarding contribution
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appellant claimed entitlement to a share in jointly acquired property following the breakup of the union, asserting specific contributions to the acquisition of various assets including land, a house, and a poultry project, valuing her contribution at 69,500/=
- Respondent
- The respondent did not deny the existence of the assets but denied that the appellant contributed any money towards their acquisition, admitting only to minor contributions as a housewife.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Married Women's Property Act; Evidence Act, section 114
Division of matrimonial property is based on contribution, direct or indirect, as per section 17 of the Married Women's Property Act and section 114 of the Evidence Act.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appellate court found that the trial court erred by disregarding credible evidence of the appellant's contribution to the acquisition of the properties, including financial and non-financial input, and held that there was sufficient evidence to establish her entitlement to a share in the properties acquired during the union.
Obiter and limits
- The question of quantum of contribution is often difficult to answer precisely, but the existence of contribution can be established on a balance of probabilities.
Court disposition
appeal allowed
- Appellant entitled to a share in the suit properties acquired during the union
- Matter remitted for division of property in accordance with the findings
Source and reliance status
TZHC
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment
(F:rorl ·i;.:.1-:- t:!.ccisiQn _,)f 'G.1.1c j)icrc1•io•t Court ,yf K:i.G2..l't1ro ri/~ :G..o·~:::'.lT<.; i11 t~l J1::<.:~l jj0.17 ·,f 1930) -----------· --~ •··- FI:UELIL S.'..ID •~••••••••••••u&.e••e•G••• vcrot.UJ \ ... LUGLKII!GIR!i. J•- -. I I •~••:-- T!.1c 0;:lpcll~i-~ sv.ccl in .,.;he Pri::.:::-;:;;.r C,;1..u:·~ n.t Kib::-.hc-, :for c.liviaio11 of ru:iso.,,o joint~~ ~-..cquirc,~. follmiincr tl:c 'brc:-.:.c: up of J:.cr li("',,'JOll ui t.'.1 the rc::ip.'.)nrlo11t, S)c n::-:.:iccl ttic:::c c..nsc/i;o u-; o::c (£t.'!,,.".r ~or Mrc cf. c, b::·.11:"l1a. plot; 0 1 ..c Pct'.1 ..-•,?" nrpjoct ii1 ",t1r,·::t ;;lo-tr 1n C't:,1cn-r:,:,1t:•c.·: :.~Oltoc? :.1n.11cnru.s for l;lt·t·~ilJG up c.110"iil1cr_ housef ~ t!.iroc-ocro 1,iccc ,·f kud foi run..u..1.l cropr3 7 ~m.1 r-. a1.111plo:.1c:1tn.ry p()ttltry ~~ojcct. In ;:er (,Otir,m.tio~l :. :c:r C J;,~tri 1JUtin11 W~-C ~,cr-·;;;_:i, 69, 500/=. 1~1i U,'..O ~lfJO C0i'.;1i,10n' e,,row1,l tha.t t1::.c. Ul1i-·n1 z-coul·tcL: i1-i-l.n f.otrr ia:::ucc wl:w rc:'.~~incd uit:.1 t:.ic raopon:.lcnt. T'.uc rcopolt:.lcn-'.; did no-t deny the rc:-..li -'iiy of t!.lc ,''..rJ::;c·~a so-'.; ou.,.; ;;,.boVCf ' ' . in1cccl 21.c {S['.VC oVi('.. cnco 31,1.bota.ntia.ll.J,· cc1li'iri:rl.llG' their c:;;:i::r~cncc. Rm-rover,· he dcnicu. -'i;b.Q:;; ·ti.le .1.p11cll~.nt co11tribu:~cc1. nt1Y r.1.')11c~r in their r..cqu.i.si ·Iii.on roid. 1 uhilc r•.,dni-'i;-ti:1,t;·
t.~:...-:•;t ,i1c C(mtribu-ccd: :.~i.:r l~:)Olll'1 1:.c: od(.1. -~h2;~ :ilc clid so ncrc]s l'..O c. b.ouscuif c. The tric.l cotu:i·~ u:-._,o 11:yt ia:_,rcsscc.\ by ·t!icoe c.r:3'\,l,:icptri4 It ·thcrcf orc fc-t.u.1(1 tor the:. rll)pcllcn·t c.llL~ orc1.crccl: "rt.---,li :.Uzo zigmtiifc n..1 ~cl...".i C-j_:OWC 1'.~.d. ,y::-.2.cc ::-::::.-:in. r.'..liVJOd~-i. I'::i'iir'.- :.~:'...~'\T~. !.J.u.11c.. i)CO:'.'., ··~r:.olii,ll.l. b.-:,,ot I ·~clcc it, i• ~ ! ·;;'..\{; court l'.llmrcd T'.c.c rcc;pon•'.~o::i.-'G 'U'['.O clin::i~tisfic.cl 1ri·ii1 tJ1io c'..ccioion c.nC~ :-.~i1-:icc.lc.::l t:10 Diotrict Cour·~. I h0vc 11('.,li oc::n -~:~c [:,Tott.2:lo r,f c.sVi::c~.1 or tho ::-xau:.1c11to c~nv::-.ri::ioc.',. (ci;pn.rcntly °b'J ~. d.voc:·;ks) before the .Hi.r.r~ric·~ 0 ourt ~ ·:;he ori[l'ilk".l l'<'c0rdr; of bo·~i courto bclou r:-xo nc, loi1:'1'or here. 13ti:t i-'G io ouffioicnt to oc;/ ·t!1~t the rcopondcri.t 'o ~:,po=-i.1 1-1.:-:-s cllouocl, -'.;1w D:i.otrict Court tt.k:i.11;_--,; -t:1.c view tlmt t.'.10 n.r;pcllnirt 11c1-l net ru:Huccd. suiiicicnt oViclcnco of !1cr _,, ·c+.~.r.:,- contribution in the ~cqu:if.li·tion of t!lc :::.o::::do, The court out o:f .nt..--..t? ••••• /2 2 IIou .,.,"". "ch'>, .., Dj_-_.~_-:>1· - c•·11-1, .. v •:-:"._ v•-' L'!r~_, .. ... t .. ,..,,,,,, •-"v ·• :_" . r.r - ~ ·•· ··.,.0·1·1t c~. .... · " " 1 1... ,_ 1 , .,_. ' 1 11.: ... :'.·rcs(;:;,ri; O.l)pcr:.
• Pcr!i.."'..IJO I r-..:1.oulJ. s·~r:.-~c t~:~'i; t:.1c ;:,,ppcc,l ::...,o :)-::"n lyinrs J~.<.:i.'o □ii.lee Jw1c, 1931, n..11.d. 1r).1c:~ i -~ :-'.'i~1:i..l:J.:,r c~;:ic ,JY Wt\)' I t"'.i;.• . c·~o.1 -'.;:1.~t i -~ 1:cr:_,c,;-.::.ln to :.1o~xi11c in -'11!.1.c [',:):: :nee r.f the rcs~.01::·.G-::.-~ :fo:.:' -~.:.!l. rc::'..aonr.; l oct 0t,_-'.; ilt th<.. rccoru. lh'. Hg::-..or..lr-,, :J,.: :•.ointc ·: r,u.t t:.:::··t -~,' .,: :.1 c;.•-~icrJ ·frcr( tosc.-~:,.oj; :for clcv-.:n :JC:'.Xs rml ·t'.1r::'1i -~:. c ~:,!,pc:l1~1t-m:.o G::'.lr..1'icc1.. ;::1::. J1~l sui.)o·~r:.1i-~i:'J.J.,7 contributu\ t~1.c c,I·-rcll,:11.·~ c:J.d:h:..:!. .1 sh~rc were.: cll::·.:;:1-';~ ~:;.i:l di □ •~rinc·ny sot ou:'.; in cvi:knoc• l -~::cro:r?ori.: cc.lll.1.0-'li t..tm:'.cro·~t·..;1t. -~:,_c rclcvr:ncc o-Z -~~-1c c_.,11.1cotion ti0t..1t of whnt?" Ao to -~.,c qUcation t1tr:1r-.:'.; r.:;:1::-;e. 0?•1; ttc iro1:,? ia th-'::~ wncn 0 o:ic rondo Jlii.1.c :..vidcncc cr:xcfull.y, ono nc-ul:1 he ozcuoc•.:. :for ::-,r..::,::i.11..; ":i;.1::-..t lu1d a.a to ·the c.[L,.cr.l'~ion "IIow aucll?", t!10 c'.l1sucr is oii.11').:,:- 69,500/1:1l In ol10rt, the ckcioim of, ~c lca:rnccl r:-1~i,cll::-.;~c ;·.1::-.i_1iotr,tc tklihcr;-:'licly. ie,11orcc1. -'i;hc evidence 0:-1 rccorC:.. T11crc w:-..o cvid<..i.1cc of -'i;:w n,nxllc.1ri; 1~c:i. 00110..lly 1 1,urehn.sing t:.~c qu,:,'..l•·~cr t.'JJrc piece c,f 0:1::-dK·,J Jli11crc
';Tt..s cvir:lcacc of her rcisin{s locn::; fror.1 v::-..riouo nr;cncico; 'iihorc· ur:.c cvicli;ncc of ·::J.ic rcspcnc'.cnt rocoi viri(; :.1r:::cy :tro:.1 her when ollc ,rr:.s tJ.T::;f 011 r, ,:, ::.iroc; ·~hc;.•o ir::-,o cvidc11cc of the rca1')r:1C~cn·i; ;-,ccour1tinc to !.lcr in -;;:1c pou.ltr:.r projcc-'li; ·~:.1crc un.a Cvil'.Cl'lCC 0:e tho l'CG)Gn,lcnt c..c.couutil1[; ·::o >.er i:l -~>.c i;I'C{:,".C-CCG o:~ -'.;pc ~:.CUSC c~nstruction~ -'i:'..1crc u.-..n, fine.Hy, ·~I::." Z'cG:1ca.":.c:!Jli 1 rJ '.;r..ci·~ r;.."'...·.1ic::iio11 t:.1::i..t ·ii!10 ~n..,cll:-,_nt t~vc :1-::r lnbour in ·i;hc roL1J:i;r~" rr:::jcct. llio s:::~,e-~ (-.ncl ncintill:--. of cviLlcncc to bn.ck up the rwcrr;,.1:.,;11t I n bolrJ. cid:.10 ·i;l1CT:t the ~socto "vh;rc -c!l.·c::-.;~cl: solely 1·rith hio mrn r.10:acy, I ,;.,':l c:--:~ioficJ. tl::.r.:t, on -~:..1c 0V'~·1l~,.1l,..; .. -r.L~cmcc, t:lc ·i;:i:•i'.'..l col.l!'t c::-.:::1c: to tho Fir•·:1·~ c-:.." cisi 011. T:.1-:.:rc i"TC'..:J □Li.:t.:'foidt .cv:i/~cncc n1)0;1 1r~1ich to f:i,11CL en . o't pro1Jr"..:)ili tics the;!; "hllc a.1)1)ol;tc.n;t contri b.1:hcc1 , . t'. b.:ilr:ncc/tc -~;1c r-.cquiai-tion •Jf th<.: c::-,Gc·.;o ·:·r1·~:n11 j~1c lc-~-.;cr r-;,1,.L npir1 t of o. 114 •YI the L'::.r of H'.'.rri:'{;c Act,· 1971. Aa i:1--1.icr:tc '.. c::~ ·~.1c bc5innin:11 ·:i,1~rc were fc•L'.r iDonco tr; '.;he union ~mi_ -;;:~c;-;c rca::.inc .1. in. -;;:w cu::rt•'.)L\y of In t:.1is cr..ac conai~lcr
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.