fikiri kasoga vs amani kabayu 2022 tzhc 15147 15 december 2022

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons and did not account for every day of delay as required by law; therefore, the court declined to exercise its discretion to extend time.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: fikiri kasoga vs amani kabayu 2022 tzhc 15147 15 december 2022
Parties: Applicant: Fikiri Kasoga; Respondent: Amani Kabayu
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 15 December 2022
Procedural Posture: Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Certification on Point of Law, Limitation Period, Sufficient Cause for Delay
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Certification on Point of Law Limitation Period Sufficient Cause for Delay

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2

Parties

Fikiri Kasoga

Applicant

Amani Kabayu

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Misc. Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to apply for certification on point of law

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to provide sufficient reasons and did not account for every day of delay as required by law; therefore, the court declined to exercise its discretion to extend time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

Application for extension of time is dismissed

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.