filemon godfrey vs maua juma 2022 tzhclandd 859 31 august 2022

filemon godfrey vs maua juma 2022 tzhclandd 859 31 august 2022

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not establish any illegality apparent on the face of record in the DLHT ruling; therefore, no sufficient reason exists for extension of time.

Citation
filemon godfrey vs maua juma 2022 tzhclandd 859 31 august 2022
Parties
Applicant: Filemon Godfrey; Respondent: Maua Juma
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Locus Standi, Service of Summons
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Illegality as Ground for Extension Locus Standi Service of Summons

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Filemon Godfrey

Applicant

Maua Juma

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether sufficient reasons exist to grant extension of time to appeal against the ruling of the District Land and Housing Tribunal (DLHT)
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegalities justify extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for each day of delay and did not establish any illegality apparent on the face of record in the DLHT ruling; therefore, no sufficient reason exists for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application for extension of time to appeal dismissed.
  • Applicant to pay costs.