19771124 TZHC Dodoma2
The appellants, though irregular in their method, acted under a genuine claim of right to money owed to them and without fraudulent intent; therefore, their conviction for theft by servant cannot stand.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19771124 TZHC Dodoma2
- Parties
- Appellant: First Accused (Secretary, Kolo Cooperative Society); Appellant: Second Accused (Assistant Secretary, Kolo Cooperative Society); Appellant: Third Accused (Committee Man, Kolo Cooperative Society); Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 24 November 1977
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; convictions quashed; appellants acquitted
- Legal Topics
- Theft by Servant, Minimum Sentences, Claim of Right, Fraudulent Intent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
First Accused (Secretary, Kolo Cooperative Society)
Appellant
Second Accused (Assistant Secretary, Kolo Cooperative Society)
Appellant
Third Accused (Committee Man, Kolo Cooperative Society)
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants were properly convicted of stealing by servant under the Penal Code given the circumstances of non-payment of salaries and their actions in paying themselves from society funds.
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants, though irregular in their method, acted under a genuine claim of right to money owed to them and without fraudulent intent; therefore, their conviction for theft by servant cannot stand.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; convictions quashed; appellants acquitted
Orders
- Appellants to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
... IN THE HIGH COURT 01:1 TAl,:ZANIA "AT :inDOl:TA JONATHAN, J Th0 three app-~lL:~nts uerc jointly convictell of r~ ·i;.:,::o..linB by S,;,:rvant enc soiit"cncocl.- un::.:0r the Hinir'.un S::mtcmccs Act·. A0 ninst tho conviction each of ·chor~ lv·.s petitionGd this court, ·:;h0 1st and 2ncl o.ccus;3d throu91 lh". Ch3T:b,?.k~,ro whila tho 3rc: 1::.ec1.,1_s,.:.,cl has :;.ppop_r-3cl in psrson. Tho accused 2,,t -~h:::;- rclGvc,,nt tir-.e wc,s ecployoc.. by Kolo Cooper:::-.tive Socj_ety o.:c Kondoa, the first G,ccused 2.s tho secret2.ry, th:3 soconcl accused c.ssist2nt socret~,ry 2,n:"_ -·-11;::; third accuse cl as o. coPI1i tteo i::.c,n, wl1.ich, howevor, uas not 2. 1x::.i(\. post. It w2,s the prosecution l,llcg~tion thnt.they jointly stole the sur,_ of shs .13, 125/== the property of th:>:; society. Th;.:; fnc"i.:is are brisf 8-nd lnrg:,ly unc1is11utcd. Tho socioty h2,s 2. sc1,fe where 2.11 -tho r.i.oney is kept. . It lv~s a r1..ouble-key syster-i., thc,t is to ·.say, to OJ_:ie11 2.ml to lock it two keys hnvo to be used. One of then vms alw-3..ys kept by -th8 first accusod and the other by the cor.ir1i ttee r:.:m. -th'3.t happened to be on duty at 2.ny ct~ven tir::e. At the relevant ti Pe the 3r('l_ accused -Wc::,G the conr:.i ·,::t ge i:~2..non du~y and hac the key. Both the the f±rst anQ second accused had not been pf;.id their salo..ries for· c, very lone tii·'.e, the forr'or for~19 r.1011ths cmd. ·the lc,tt0r for 21 nonths. PW.2 the watchnan, too, h,:i,cl not bo;.;n po.id.. On the relev~u1t clay three payr:.ent vouchers 2,pp :,ar -to ha,ve b .,on prepc'.red to po.y each of the thro,::: eo.ployoos accordinc; to how nuch -~hey were ow~·c1 by -the soci ·.::ty. Tho rocuh'1tions roquiroc1 tli;.::t no p~~,ynent should be nncle without the prior 2,uthorjsation of tho corr.ittce nan on duty. IncLocl, no r:,oney could b~; tcJ.rnn out of the safe with out his cons on ting anJ. hrwii:ie tho s2:.i:o op911ed. After tho payr.1Hn t voucher w,~s r:2..de out both tho firr:-1J.:; 2nd second accused receivoc1 thoir res-pocti vc su:·,.s nncl thciy duly signed for thor1 in th0 p2.y1:-2ent vouchers. The thircl-p2.yr::.:nt. voucher does not a,ppco.,r to hr.,vo bvc:11 sie,nec1 by PW .2. Tho witness in his evidence c1..cniGtl to h;::,vc rec ivecl tho sun 1 .• 2 2 reflected in thr.t docunent. It 1J':;,S ho1✓ over the contcnt:i.n:n of the first ancl second e.cclw.,·t ~~h. the:: rF.S p:::i.id tJ.rt 8I'.ount, ~,::.1c~ th0 lc;i:;tor substantiatinc th-3 c12,in producccl a chit~ which he saic1 had been· sic;ne'c1 l)y. PU-~·2 · 8.8 e. receipt. - .~his ._natter wz:i.r{ not - , definitivoJ,.y resolved by ·t~h8 louer. c0urt :Out h2;d it_pursuad . _, tt . to finality I woulcl. think. it w·oulcl h:=-=.vc given tho- defence the bencfi t of doubt th,:\t tho r .0i'L:y r1.ic;ht- ho,vo b:Jen paid -~o _PW. 2 ,. 1 ~specially o.s it could not h · vo ::i ;Gl1 token out o.:: the i:.;2,fe wilbho- ut the consent of. the 3rc~ accus-2u. • d. 3 , o, coC.'n,erative officer qh.E:ckoc: the. ,S one weE:: 1cs 1 a 1,.-:r p1,- .L account of tJ.12.t society 9 wl1·:?rou.pon he· discovered the short;":,[,;0 • I • . • • and founc.~ the thret~ pn;yr:.en-f· vcSuchers • t Tho accmJed., he cci:ql2.ined, w.-:.ro not ,11101·'"",.:i i·o r1,ilrn - '-" (..r., .L,-.,.~x., 'V V\.4 ~-~} I.J ••• \.J I 11 ·:.rr'·:,11,-i·s ') ~-1"<.,~/.--~V. no·'1,·1•1·i+h""t~n0ii1.r•· O -:•ht·. -:•J:rree ,V , - V (...l, • '-) V ..,..., U enployees had genuina clah1s,.. C/11:, . ·L;ho society • . ralev2.nt c~ny he 11~1,s net; th.,J co:;·; .i·ctc ;'.:an on du:t;y e,11c~ ·;;lL·t ·· !1':: person on. (.uty w2~s DW .4 whon called. This was. howey·,:c (~cniecl he by ·che witness who said. :l:;ho t:.drcl' accus "d ha/'_ been·, ·cho l) ;:,.'.'son on duty. I D.r::. SF.1.tisfi~cl on th:1 ;_,vi(GnCE) the 101:rnr cc·ur~ correctly fou.nc1 ·chu t}J.i rd 9,ccu.s :d to :·2.- vo b ,e,n on duty t·:1.en. Inr>:oc1, before 1 this court t:!::i.is e.ccus ·•··d h2.1=.;.: ;,.f:.;1j.-~;tc:d h'.; wc.1.s on (~uty 2.ncl ,.:.CJ::•.J :d Jrn hG,VG tho n011ey t,1Jcon out of the :..:afe. Ha clai.r-:s, hc'1-rev0r ~ th~-:.t he understoorl t:h0 r:onGy,r was b 1.:::~_nc ·c:-i.ken out to buy produce ::D.1t i"i:; we.a.not intcnc~o1 tc a:·;ply i't···£01-·rc.rc~s p~fn.nc; t1.1.o Lrrcc::,rs of s,:11,:::.ries. Thj_:3 is 1:m aftcrthC:n.ic;ht 2.11 11 I nn srd;isfiecl 2.s w2.s ·che lower court ,;,1-!-110u.~h lJ 1·., ,.. -C, ·'C# )t J_hr ~--, ,_, \J ti•.,.., .. , lY1•r 3 c1 1·c1 J-'1e· l,l chr.•c .:.; .~.),.. J.• : ..... _( t. ~- _ 1"'1·,'),... +11° "J,;,,~rr- --·Jt. vrn, .. t:_, V .i:: (A.,.jJ..1.\..rl. .i, ... V 0 U \...'lA,. chers hnd not b·.,on sign:.;d ;::,y th,) ·[;hire~ 2:.ccu.sed n.s the 2.uthorising offic inl, he hs.cl inf2.ct :~.uthcr~.sod tho nonoy to bo np 1)lic:c1 towards paynon t of thos,.3 s2:.l2.ri<JS. Both the leo.rned ;:-,,C.vocr.ta for tlrn fj_rst and secorHl appellant an<l U1e lr:,2.rnuc: st::·.te attrrney are in .?, 0 r·:;ermnt t;-i,-·,t, on the f;:·.cts of the cc:•.sG ·cl1.-J c.)pc:Jlla;1ts uerc wrci·0 ly cc:. 1v:Lc·c0d. For the rs2.sons t111Jy hr.vo c;j.vGn I :i,n : r·2~p\1ctfufully oi ·i;hrJ r:::.-~ :e vj_ew. rn11e ..L , ~ U -:iccl'''P.c~ fi· ,,,c:,·'G -:-,.,ro c,., ;,,,, ,, •._:_, ..., . ~-..-,(~ P1.J e 2 f --·fnr \., C.:,J.!. .....,,,.,,;.c•o·1s J. ,• 1 '·l.11.7 C1'1 J. ',,~N•~ V' ...._--' i -:,,,,, '-J ,,J... paid. In the Emd, presu:.:2))ly out of clespir:,.tion, th.:·y clocicJ.cc'.. to pay thenselves, aut of thr.~_..funds of· ·the society, their Eff1.plc,yor, this with the sa11c·Gion nf thr-; ·c'.'.811 coruitt(.JG J:18.ll on ,lu·ty whc Wf\S infz.1.ct the vice-ch~.irn.:'n o-r- -;;h8 :=;ooi r/;?, c,nc:. 7.f~ninst o.. recei:yt; :i..:i.1 G:·,ch cc,se. Cnn they, when thoy :x•,:Lcl. th :-)nr,;r:lves unc~er those circu;,:,:s·cz,,,,,"1.ces and in -tb.c..t n2..nner, be s~:-J.(1. tc h,•.vr; :::,.ct,K1 °frnudulently .::.ml w:tthout 1 - 3 ... . .r-;. o.. clnin of righ:t" .:·ri tJ:lin th: definition proV-id.:::c1 in section, 0 : 258 of the ·Peno..l Code'?• Certo,inly not_. ,. . The s_ociety ouecl . 4il1en :thccm suns and n.ltht,uc;h• it nsy h::,,ve b~..>en 11rong ' tho short cut they resort:.c: to 1 th~;;y not only ho,d 2, cl2.E1. of . - •' right on the ncm.Gy but in 1:~1r thc;y c,lso 2.cted innocently. L . ' 8.nd it is ordered · the a1)pello,J1ts be sot rtt 1i1:vffty. if tb_.. ey o.ro ' ' - . not otl-ic}rwiGr~ ·lawfully helc~. 1,~\ :P.M. · JO:NATHAN 9 •JUDGE Delivered in open c,Jurt this