first national bank tanzania ltd vs hussein ahmed salwar ta pugu hardware 2000 another 2020 tzca 325 19 june 2020
The applicant satisfied the Court that the respondents took no part in the High Court proceedings and that attempts at service were unsuccessful, justifying dispensing with service under rule 84(1).
- Citation
- first national bank tanzania ltd vs hussein ahmed salwar ta pugu hardware 2000 another 2020 tzca 325 19 june 2020
- Parties
- Applicant: First National Bank Tanzania Limited; 1st Respondent: Hussein Ahmed Salwar t/a Pugu Hardware (2000); 2nd Respondent: Ahmed Hussein Abdulkarim
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Application for Direction Dispensing With Service of Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Dispensing With Service, Appeals
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
First National Bank Tanzania Limited
Applicant
Hussein Ahmed Salwar t/a Pugu Hardware (2000)
1st Respondent
Ahmed Hussein Abdulkarim
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Direction Dispensing With Service of Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be dispensed from serving the notice of appeal on the respondents under rule 84(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant satisfied the Court that the respondents took no part in the High Court proceedings and that attempts at service were unsuccessful, justifying dispensing with service under rule 84(1).
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- Service of the notice of appeal on the respondents is dispensed with.
- No order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment