flora gooluck mush vs hellena costa another 2024 tzhclandd 56 29 february 2024
The Tribunal was justified in finding the First and Second Respondent as co-owners of the disputed land under the presumption of marriage, and the sale agreement between the Appellant and the Second Respondent was nullified for lack of consent from the co-owner.
- Citation
- flora gooluck mush vs hellena costa another 2024 tzhclandd 56 29 february 2024
- Parties
- Appellant: Flora Goodluck Mushi; 1st Respondent: Hellena Costa; 2nd Respondent: Idrisa Issa Makombe
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Co Ownership, Matrimonial Property, Sale of Land, Presumption of Marriage, Consent in Land Disposition
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Flora Goodluck Mushi
Appellant
Hellena Costa
1st Respondent
Idrisa Issa Makombe
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First Respondent was the legal wife of the Second Respondent and thus a co-owner of the disputed land
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in relying on evidence that did not disclose the First Respondent as owner of the disputed land
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was justified in finding the First and Second Respondent as co-owners of the disputed land under the presumption of marriage, and the sale agreement between the Appellant and the Second Respondent was nullified for lack of consent from the co-owner.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment