CIVIL APPLICATION NO

CIVIL APPLICATION NO

The application was filed more than five months after the refusal of the first bite, without a certificate of delay or evidence of applying for records, rendering it time barred under Rule 45A(1)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Citation
CIVIL APPLICATION NO
Parties
Applicant: Florence Mwilinga; Respondent: Laiton Mwilinga
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Second Bite Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application struck out as time barred
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Certificate on Point of Law, Time Bar, Second Bite Application
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Certificate on Point of Law Time Bar Second Bite Application

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Florence Mwilinga

Applicant

Laiton Mwilinga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Second Bite Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the application is competent before the Court
  2. 2 whether the applicant has adduced sufficient cause to warrant grant of extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The application was filed more than five months after the refusal of the first bite, without a certificate of delay or evidence of applying for records, rendering it time barred under Rule 45A(1)(a) of the Court of Appeal Rules.

Court Disposition

application struck out as time barred

Orders

  • application struck out
  • each party to bear own costs