flcatcar safari ltd vs singha gurupreet bhachu 2018 tzhc 2272 11 october 2018
- Citation
- flcatcar safari ltd vs singha gurupreet bhachu 2018 tzhc 2272 11 october 2018
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 11 October 2018
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 11 October 2018
- Posture
- Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The appeal is incompetent for failure to attach a copy of the judgment as required by law and is struck out with costs.
Court disposition
appeal struck out with costs
Orders
- Appeal struck out
- Costs awarded to respondent
02
Material facts
Parties
Flycatcer Safari Limited
Appellant Counsel: Mr. MsangiGurupreet Singh Bhachu
Respondent Counsel: Mr. Mustapha03
Procedural history
Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the appeal is competent without attachment of a copy of the judgment as required by law
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The appeal is properly before the court because it is against the decision.
- Respondent
- Attachment of a copy of the judgment is a mandatory requirement under Section 39(1) of the Civil Procedure Code unless dispensed with.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 39(1) of the Civil Procedure Code
Attachment of a copy of the judgment in an appeal is a mandatory requirement unless dispensed with.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The appeal is incompetent for failure to attach a copy of the judgment as required by law and is struck out with costs.
Court disposition
appeal struck out with costs
- Appeal struck out
- Costs awarded to respondent
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 11 October 2018
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 11 October 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (IN THE DISTRICT REGISTRY)
AT ARUSHA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 11 OF 2018 (C/f Resident magistrate Court, Arusha Civii Case No. 4 o f 2016; High Court o f Tanzania Misc. Application No. 123 o f 2017) FLYCATCER SAFARI LIMITED..................................... APPELLANT
VERSUS GURUPREET SINGH BHACHU................... RESPONDENT
RULING BEFORE: I. MAIGE, J The memorandum of appeal is notaccompanied with a copy of judgment. When I requested the counsel to addressme on that issue, Mr. Msangi who took the conduct of the appeal for the appellant submitted that the appeal is properly before me because the appeal is against the decision. Mr. Mustapha learned advocate for the Respondent submitted, correctly in my view, that under Section 39(1) of CPC attachment of a copy of judgment in appeal is mandatory requirement, unless the same is dispensed with. i In my opinion therefore, for the reason of not being accompanied with a copy of judgment, this appeal is incompitently before the court and it is hereby struck out with costs. I. MAIGE
JUDGE 18/ 10/2018 Court: Ruling delivered, suit struck out. I. MAIGE
JUDGE 18/ 10/2018
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.