fnb tanzania ltd vs juma kipakapaka na mwenzake 2022 tzhcld 704 14 july 2022

The affidavit was defective due to improper jurat, and as per established practice in labour matters, no costs are awarded.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: fnb tanzania ltd vs juma kipakapaka na mwenzake 2022 tzhcld 704 14 july 2022
Parties: Applicant: FNB Tanzania Ltd; Respondent: Juma Kipakapaka; Respondent: Valence Lamtei
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 14 July 2022
Procedural Posture: Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Outcome: application struck out with leave to refile within seven days, no order as to costs
Legal Topics: Affidavit Defects, Preliminary Objection, Costs in Labour Matters
Source Language: english

Labour Law Affidavit Defects Preliminary Objection Costs in Labour Matters

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

FNB Tanzania Ltd

Applicant

Juma Kipakapaka

Respondent

Valence Lamtei

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Revision Application / Ruling on Preliminary Objection

Legal Issues

1 Whether the affidavit supporting the application is defective due to improper jurat
2 Whether costs should be awarded in labour matters

Ratio Decidendi

The affidavit was defective due to improper jurat, and as per established practice in labour matters, no costs are awarded.

Court Disposition

application struck out with leave to refile within seven days, no order as to costs

Orders

preliminary objection upheld
application struck out

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.