francis so john vs jumanne yaasin 2020 tzhc 760 24 april 2020

Application struck out due to procedural irregularities including incorrect judge's name and date in the notice of appeal, rendering the application incompetent.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: francis so john vs jumanne yaasin 2020 tzhc 760 24 april 2020
Parties: Applicant: Francis John; Respondent: Jumanne Yassin
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 24 April 2020
Procedural Posture: Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application struck out with costs
Legal Topics: Leave to Appeal, Appellate Jurisdiction, Procedural Irregularities
Source Language: english

Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Appellate Jurisdiction Procedural Irregularities

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Francis John

Applicant

Jumanne Yassin

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the applicant established sufficient grounds for leave to appeal
2 Whether procedural irregularities render the application incompetent

Ratio Decidendi

Application struck out due to procedural irregularities including incorrect judge's name and date in the notice of appeal, rendering the application incompetent.

Court Disposition

Application struck out with costs

Orders

Application struck out
Costs awarded to respondent

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.