19990219 TZCA Arusha
Both the revision application and the intended appeal can be dealt with simultaneously under s.4(2) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act; thus, the application need not be struck out, and the preliminary objection is dismissed.
- Citation
- 19990219 TZCA Arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: Francis Kwaang Musei; Respondents: Hon. Wilbroad Peter Slaa and Others
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling
- Outcome
- Preliminary objection dismissed; hearing of revision application stayed pending outcome of intended appeal.
- Legal Topics
- Revision Jurisdiction, Costs Orders, Right of Appeal, Election Petitions
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Francis Kwaang Musei
Applicant
Hon. Wilbroad Peter Slaa and Others
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant can seek revision when a right of appeal exists
- 2 Whether the application for revision is competent given the pending appeal
Ratio Decidendi
Both the revision application and the intended appeal can be dealt with simultaneously under s.4(2) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act; thus, the application need not be struck out, and the preliminary objection is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Preliminary objection dismissed; hearing of revision application stayed pending outcome of intended appeal.
Orders
- Preliminary objection dismissed without order for costs.
- Hearing of this application stayed pending hearing of the intended appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment