frank julius ndege vs republic 2023 tzca 17829 15 november 2023

frank julius ndege vs republic 2023 tzca 17829 15 november 2023

The applicant accounted for the delay due to late receipt of the certified judgment and demonstrated that the intended review is based on grounds recognized under Rule 66(1). The respondent did not contest the application. The Court found the reasons reasonable, especially considering the applicant's status as a prisoner, and granted the extension of time.

Citation
frank julius ndege vs republic 2023 tzca 17829 15 november 2023
Parties
Applicant: Frank Julius Ndege; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
15 November 2023
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review
Outcome
Application granted
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review of Judgment, Good Cause Requirement
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Frank Julius Ndege

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Review

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to file a review application out of time
  2. 2 Whether the intended review raises arguable grounds under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant accounted for the delay due to late receipt of the certified judgment and demonstrated that the intended review is based on grounds recognized under Rule 66(1). The respondent did not contest the application. The Court found the reasons reasonable, especially considering the applicant's status as a prisoner, and granted the extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • The applicant is granted extension of time to file an application for review.
  • The applicant must lodge the application for review within 60 days from the date of this ruling.