frank mh mhilu versus fatuma hussein mohamed another 2023 tzhclandd 16534 25 may 2023
There were no illegalities or irregularities in the execution proceedings or orders that warranted revision by the High Court. The execution was based on a valid, unchallenged decree, and the Chairman's actions did not amount to irregularity.
- Citation
- frank mh mhilu versus fatuma hussein mohamed another 2023 tzhclandd 16534 25 may 2023
- Parties
- Applicant: Frank M.H. Mhilu; 1st Respondent: Fatuma Hussein Mohamed; 2nd Respondent: Force Focus (Court Broker)
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Land Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Execution Order
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Revision, Execution of Decrees, Supervisory Jurisdiction, Restitution
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Frank M.H. Mhilu
Applicant
Fatuma Hussein Mohamed
1st Respondent
Force Focus (Court Broker)
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Revision / Ruling on Application for Revision of Execution Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the execution orders granted by the District Land and Housing Tribunal contained irregularities or illegalities warranting revision by the High Court
Ratio Decidendi
There were no illegalities or irregularities in the execution proceedings or orders that warranted revision by the High Court. The execution was based on a valid, unchallenged decree, and the Chairman's actions did not amount to irregularity.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed
- Applicant to pay costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment