fred raphael ilomo vs republic 2016 tzhc 2119 19 december 2016
The applicant is entitled to bail as the offences are bailable, there is no legal prohibition, and the respondent does not object; bail is granted subject to statutory conditions including deposit of half the amount involved and provision of reliable sureties.
- Citation
- fred raphael ilomo vs republic 2016 tzhc 2119 19 december 2016
- Parties
- Applicant: Fred Raphael Ilomo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Economic Application / Bail Application Pending Committal Proceedings
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Jurisdiction, Economic and Organized Crime Control
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fred Raphael Ilomo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Economic Application / Bail Application Pending Committal Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in economic crime cases involving property valued at ten million shillings or more
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under the circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is entitled to bail as the offences are bailable, there is no legal prohibition, and the respondent does not object; bail is granted subject to statutory conditions including deposit of half the amount involved and provision of reliable sureties.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Applicant to deposit cash or property worth Tshs. 8,913,000/-
- Applicant to produce two reliable sureties, each to execute a bond of Tshs. 5,000,000/-, one of whom must be a government employee
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment