Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHC

frown haule vs jackline kalesa 2024 tzhc 791 14 march 2024

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The requirement for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal has been abolished by the Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 Of 2023, and this procedural change applies retrospectively to all actions after its commencement.

Court disposition

application struck out

Orders

  • application struck out of the registry
  • no order as to costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Frowin Haule

Applicant

Jackline J. Kalesa

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal is required after the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal against the judgment of the High Court in Probate and Administration Appeal No. 6 of 2017.
Respondent
No substantive argument recorded; respondent present.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393

    Procedural amendments to law are retrospective unless otherwise provided.

  2. 02

    Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 Of 2023

    Leave to appeal is no longer required for appeals from the High Court after the amendment of section 5 of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The requirement for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal has been abolished by the Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 Of 2023, and this procedural change applies retrospectively to all actions after its commencement.

Court disposition

application struck out

  • application struck out of the registry
  • no order as to costs

Source and reliance status

TZHC · 14 March 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHC

Judgment· 14 March 2024

frown haule vs jackline kalesa 2024 tzhc 791 14 march 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

SUMBAWANGA DISTRICT REGISTRY

AT SUMBAWANGA MISC. LAND APPLICATION NO. 11 OF 2023 (From HC Probate and Administration Appeal No. 6 of 2017 in the High Court of Tanzania Sumbawanga Sub-Registry) FROWIN HAULE............................................................................. APPLICANT <*

VERSUS JACKLINE J. KALESA.................................................................. RESPONDENT 14/03/2024 & 14/03/2024

RULING MWENEMPAZI, J. In this application the applicants felt aggrieved by the judgement of the High Court (Hon. AJ. MAMBI, J.) delivered on the 27th August, 2018 in the Probate and Administration Appeal No. 6 of 2017. Hence, they filed this application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The application is made under section 5(1) (c) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act, 1979 [Cap 141 R.E 2019]. The Parliament of the United Republic of Tanzania has recent/ enacted a law, Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 Of 2023 which came into effect on 1st December, 2023. Section 10 of the said i Act, amends section 5 of the Appellate jurisdiction Act, [Cap 141 R.E 2023], repeals section 5(1) by deleting it and substituting for it the following: - n(l) In civil proceedings except where any other written law provides otherwise, an appeal shall He to the court of appeaj against every order or decree, including an ex- parte or preliminary decree made by the High Court, in the exercise of its original, appellate or revisional jurisdiction". The changes featured in the quoted provision of law, have done away with the requirement of leave for one to appeal to the court of appeal against any decision of the high court, regardless of whether the impugned decision is an order, decree, and ex parte decree or a preliminary decree when exercising its original, appellate or

revisional jurisdiction. In other words, obtaining leave has ceased to be a requirement for one to appeal to the Court of Appeal of Tanzania effectively from 1st December, 2023. Since the changes have a bearing on procedure law, the applicability of changes has a retrospective effect as well. In case of Director of Public 2 Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393 (7 September 2018) it was held that: - "Procedural amendments to a law, in absence of anything contrary, are retrospective in the sense that they apply to all actions after the date they came into force even though the actions may have begun earlier or the claim on which the action may be based occurred on the anterior date". Under the circumstances, this application is overtaken by events and therefore the same is struct out of the registry. No order is issued as to costs. It is ordered accordingly. Dated and delivered at Sr.nbawanga this 14th March, 2024. T.M. MWENEMPAZI

JUDGE Ruling delivered this 14th March, 2024 in the presence of Mr. Frowin Haule the applicant herein named and Ms. Jackline J. Kalesa, the Responder/.;. T.M. MWENEMPAZI

JUDGE 14/03/223 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Director of Public Prosecution (DPP) Vs. Jackson Sifael Mtares (Criminal Appeal No. 2 of 2018) [2018] TZCA 393

Case cited

Appellate Jurisdiction Act, Cap 141 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Legal Sector Law (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act, No. 11 Of 2023

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.