Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

MIsc

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The matter was amicably settled by a deed of settlement, which was adopted by the court as a consent judgment, binding all parties and disposing of the suit.

Court disposition

Amicably settled and withdrawn from court records

Orders

  • Plaintiff to pay outstanding rent from January to December 2024 at USD 800 per month on or before 31/10/2024
  • 1st Defendant offers Plaintiff to purchase property at USD 125,000 payable between 8/10/2024 and 31/12/2024
  • If Plaintiff fails to pay outstanding rent by 31/10/2024, offer to purchase ceases and Plaintiff must vacate premises by December 2024
  • Each party to bear its own costs

02

Material facts

Parties

Gabriel J. Mtitu

Applicant Counsel: Jerome Msemwa and Paul Mtui

Nathumal Pitoomal Gunamal (Sajnani)

Respondent

Fosters and Company Limited

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Rent for 2024: USD 9,600
  • Purchase Price of Property: USD 125,000
  • Painting Compensation: TZS 33,847,590.6
  • Renovation Compensation: TZS 10,426,000
  • Excess Rent Compensation: TZS 22,571,589.6

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Misc. Land Application / Consent Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant sought orders declaring the defendants' notices as breach of sale agreement, injunction against interference, and compensation for painting, renovations, and excess rent.
Respondent
The respondents reached an amicable settlement with the applicant, agreeing to terms regarding rent payment and property purchase.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019

    Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, the court shall order such an agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded, and shall pass a decree in accordance therewith so far as it relates to the suit.

  2. 02

    Motor Vessel Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two Others, Civil Application No. 237 of 2013

    Where there is a lawful agreement or compromise, the Court is bound to record settlement once it arrived by the parties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The matter was amicably settled by a deed of settlement, which was adopted by the court as a consent judgment, binding all parties and disposing of the suit.

Court disposition

Amicably settled and withdrawn from court records

  • Plaintiff to pay outstanding rent from January to December 2024 at USD 800 per month on or before 31/10/2024
  • 1st Defendant offers Plaintiff to purchase property at USD 125,000 payable between 8/10/2024 and 31/12/2024
  • If Plaintiff fails to pay outstanding rent by 31/10/2024, offer to purchase ceases and Plaintiff must vacate premises by December 2024
  • Each party to bear its own costs

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 20 April 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 20 April 2024

MIsc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA

LAND DIVISION

AT PAR ES SALAAM MISC. LAND APPLICATION CASE NO. 14547 OF 2024 (C/F Land Case No. 1431 of 2024 Before Hon. Sarah Mwaipopo) GABRIEL J. MTITU............................................................. APPLICANT

VERSUS NATHUMAL PITOOMAL GUNAMAL (SAJNANI)...... 1st RESPONDENT FOSTERS AND COMPANY LIMITED...................... 2nd RESPONDENT

CONSENTJUDGMENT (Deed of Settlement) Date of last Order: 20/11/2024 Date ofJudgment: 25/11/2024 LALTAIKA, J The Plaintiff herein Gabriel j. mtitu instituted this suit against the Defendants for judgment and decree as follows: 1. An order that the notices issued by the Defendants are in breach of the sale agreement in respect of the landed property on plot and Block No. Ha-2-931 & 2308/156, Ilala Dar es Salaam entered by the 1st Page 1 of 5 Defendant and the Plaintiff, that hence the Plaintiff be ai/owed to finalize payments as agreed.

2. A perpetual injunction directing the Defendants, their employees, agents assignee or any other person claiming authority or ownership from/of the suit property to refrain from interfering with peaceful enjoyment of the Plaintiffs' ownership and occupation of the suit land.

3. In the alternative to (i) and (ii) above; an order for payment of the sum of Thirty-Three MHHo Eight Hundred Forty-Seven Thousand Five Hundred Ninety and Sixty Cent (TZS. 33,847,590.60) for painting the building as pleaded on paragraph 6; Ten Million Four Hundred Twenty- Six Thousand (TZS. 10,426,000) for renovations as pleaded on paragraph 11; Twenty-Two Million Five Hundred Seventy -One Thousand Five Hundred Eight-Nine and Sixty Cents (TZS. 22,571,589.60) paid in excess of rent for period of 21 months.

4. General damages.

5. Costs of the proceedings be provided for. When the suit was called for mention on 20/11/2024, Messrs. Jerome Msemwa and Paul Mtui, learned Advocates for the Plaintiff informed this Court that parties had reached an amicable solution before a Mediator Judge. Msemwa prayed that the deed of settlement be incorporated in the consent judgment to dispose of the matter. Having obtained the duly signed Deed of Settlement, I proceed as hereunder. Page 2 of 5 In the event of the status given, this Court is guided by Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 of R.E of 2019 that: "Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that a suit has been adjusted wholly or in part by any lawful agreement or compromise, or where the defendant satisfies the plaintiffin respect of the whole or any part of the subject matter of the suit, the court shall order such an agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded, and shall pass a decree in accordance there with so far as it relates to the suit." Consequently, I proceed to adopt the terms and conditions of the Deed of Settlement dated the 20th day of April 2024, to form part and parcel of this consent judgment as appearing herein below: - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto acting through their authorized officers or representatives or directly themselves have executed this deed of settlement on the day and year as above

written in the following manner appearing NOW THEREFORE, both parties hereto agree as follows: - 1. That, the Plaintiff to pay the Defendant outstanding rent from January to December 2024 at the rate of USD 800 per month on or before 31/10/2024. Page 3 of 5 2. That the 1st Defendant offers the Plaintiff to purchase property situated on plot No. 1 la-2-931 & 2308/156 Indira Ghandhi Street Dar es Salaam at the purchase price of USD 125, 000 payable in single payment between 8/10/2024 up to 31/12/2024.

3. That, in the event the Plaintiff fails to pay outstanding rent as of 31/10/2024, the offer to purchase the property will automatically cease and the Plaintiff will vacate the suit premise forthwith not later than December 2024 without further notice.

4. That, each party to bear its own costs. Therefore, I hereby declare the executed Deed of Settlement effective from the date when it was lodged in this court, that is, on 25th day of November 2024, binds all parties herein and to the subsequent applications or suits arising from the same cause of action. Henceforth the deed of settlement entered is accordingly recorded and form part of this Consent Judgment as held by the Court of Appeal in the case of Motor Vessel Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two Others, Civil Application No. 237 of 2013, (Unreported) thus: "Where there is a lawful agreement or compromise, the Court is bound to record settlement once it arrived by the parties." Page 4 of 5 In lieu of the foregoing, the present matter is marked amicably settled to the extent of the deed of settlement reached by the parties as per terms and conditions therein, hence withdrawn from the court records. It is so ordered. E. I. LALTAIKA

JUDGE 25/11/2024 Court Judgment delivered in Chambers this 25th day of November 2024 in the absence of Mr. Paul Mtui, Counsel for the Plaintiff. E. I. LALTAIKA

JUDGE 25/11/2024 Page 5 of 5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Motor Vessel Sepideh and Another v. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two Others, Civil Application No. 237 of 2013

Case cited

Civil Procedure Code, Cap.33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.