gapco t limited vs tedvan c nabora 2011 tzhc 2036 1 june 2011

The application for extension of time was properly before the court under section 14(1) of the Law of Limitation Act, and the affidavit was properly attested in compliance with the law.

Citation: gapco t limited vs tedvan c nabora 2011 tzhc 2036 1 june 2011
Parties: Applicant: GAPCO (T) LIMITED; Respondent: TEDVAN C. NABORA
Court: TZHC
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 1 June 2011
Procedural Posture: Civil Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling
Outcome: preliminary objections dismissed
Legal Topics: Extension of Time, Affidavit Attestation, Preliminary Objection
Source Language: English

Civil Procedure Extension of Time Affidavit Attestation Preliminary Objection

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

GAPCO (T) LIMITED

Applicant

TEDVAN C. NABORA

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Revision / Preliminary Objection Ruling

Legal Issues

1 Whether the application for extension of time was filed under the correct provision of law
2 Whether the supporting affidavit was incurably defective for lack of attestation

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was properly before the court under section 14(1) of the Law of Limitation Act, and the affidavit was properly attested in compliance with the law.

Court Disposition

preliminary objections dismissed

Orders

Points of objection dismissed
Costs to abide with the outcome of the application