20170802 TZCA Arusha
The grounds for review are identical to those raised and determined in the appeal; Rule 66(1) does not permit review on such grounds; application dismissed.
- Citation
- 20170802 TZCA Arusha
- Parties
- Applicant: Gasper August Urio; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review After Dismissal of Second Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Review of Appellate Judgment, Visual Identification Evidence, Grounds for Review Under Rule 66
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Gasper August Urio
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application for Review / Ruling on Application for Review After Dismissal of Second Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether grounds raised in appeal can be raised as grounds for review
- 2 Whether the application meets the criteria under Rule 66(1) of the Tanzania Court of Appeal Rules, 2009
Ratio Decidendi
The grounds for review are identical to those raised and determined in the appeal; Rule 66(1) does not permit review on such grounds; application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for review is dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment