gema security services vs paul gervas duwe 2011 tzhc 2149 6 april 2011
The claim arose before the commencement of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2004, so the District Court had jurisdiction under the repealed Employment Act. The claims for leave and overtime were sufficiently specific, and the preliminary objection was addressed in the judgment without causing injustice.
- Citation
- gema security services vs paul gervas duwe 2011 tzhc 2149 6 april 2011
- Parties
- Appellant: Gema Security Service; Respondent: Paul Gervas Duwe
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 6 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction, Transitional Provisions, Leave Entitlement, Overtime Pay
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gema Security Service
Appellant
Paul Gervas Duwe
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the District Court had jurisdiction to entertain the employment claim after the repeal of the Employment Act, Cap. 366
- 2 Whether the claims for leave and overtime were specific and clear
- 3 Whether the preliminary objection on jurisdiction was properly addressed
Ratio Decidendi
The claim arose before the commencement of the Employment and Labour Relations Act, 2004, so the District Court had jurisdiction under the repealed Employment Act. The claims for leave and overtime were sufficiently specific, and the preliminary objection was addressed in the judgment without causing injustice.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- No order as to costs
- Parties to be notified of the judgment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment