generator logic vs eli mukuta 2022 tzca 115 16 march 2022

generator logic vs eli mukuta 2022 tzca 115 16 march 2022

The High Court's order striking out the application for revision was interlocutory, not final, as it did not finally determine the rights of the parties. Section 5(2)(d) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act bars appeals against such interlocutory orders. The appeal was therefore incompetent and struck out.

Citation
generator logic vs eli mukuta 2022 tzca 115 16 march 2022
Parties
Appellant: Generator Logic; Respondent: Eli Mukuta
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
16 March 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Appealability of High Court Order
Outcome
Appeal struck out as incompetent
Legal Topics
Appealability of Interlocutory Orders, Jurisdiction, Setting Aside Ex Parte Awards
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Generator Logic

Appellant

Eli Mukuta

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection Regarding Appealability of High Court Order

  1. 1 Whether the High Court's order striking out an application for revision is appealable
  2. 2 Whether the order was interlocutory or final

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court's order striking out the application for revision was interlocutory, not final, as it did not finally determine the rights of the parties. Section 5(2)(d) of the Appellate Jurisdiction Act bars appeals against such interlocutory orders. The appeal was therefore incompetent and struck out.

Court Disposition

Appeal struck out as incompetent

Orders

  • Appeal struck out for being against an interlocutory order
  • No order as to costs