george barabara vs aristides litaka 2020 tzhclandd 36 24 march 2020

george barabara vs aristides litaka 2020 tzhclandd 36 24 march 2020

The applicant's illness, supported by a police loss report in lieu of medical certificates, combined with old age, constitutes sufficient good cause for the delay. The respondent will not suffer any noticeable loss if extension is granted, and the right to be heard justifies allowing the application.

Citation
george barabara vs aristides litaka 2020 tzhclandd 36 24 march 2020
Parties
Applicant: George Barabara; Respondent: Aristides D Litaka
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
24 March 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeal Procedure, Good Cause for Delay
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George Barabara

Applicant

Aristides D Litaka

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated good cause for extension of time to file an appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's illness, supported by a police loss report in lieu of medical certificates, combined with old age, constitutes sufficient good cause for the delay. The respondent will not suffer any noticeable loss if extension is granted, and the right to be heard justifies allowing the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Applicant to file intended appeal within 14 days from the date of the order
  • Each party to bear his own costs