19980508 TZHC Dar es Salaam
Fourteen months of inactivity constitutes negligence and does not warrant exercise of discretion to extend time for appeal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- 19980508 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Applicant: George E. Stanley; Defendant: Tiama:l.ho.ni Abasi Sakapala; Respondent: Respondent
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 8 May 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals, Jurisdiction, Preliminary Objection
- Source Language
- english
Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Jurisdiction Preliminary Objection
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
George E. Stanley
Applicant
Tiama:l.ho.ni Abasi Sakapala
Defendant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to extension of time to appeal
- 2 Whether delay in appealing was justified
Ratio Decidendi
Fourteen months of inactivity constitutes negligence and does not warrant exercise of discretion to extend time for appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application for extension of time to appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment