Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

george kalistus mtenda vs oiko credit ua another 2015 tzhclandd 20 8 december 2015

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application is withdrawn as the relief sought has already been granted by the Deputy Registrar, rendering the suit academic.

Court disposition

Suit withdrawn

Orders

  • Suit withdrawn with no order as to costs
  • Each party to bear their own costs

02

Material facts

Parties

George Kalistus Mtenda

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Mashauri Charles

Oiko Credit U.A

1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Mapunda G.

Jagro Enterprises Limited

2nd Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Case / Order on Withdrawal of Suit

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the application for release of non-collateral properties is still maintainable after the Deputy Registrar's order

Party arguments

Applicant
The application has been overtaken by events as the Deputy Registrar has already issued the order sought, releasing properties not submitted as collateral.
Respondent
The 1st Respondent concurs that the Deputy Registrar's order has addressed the matter and agrees to withdrawal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Court practice

    A suit may be withdrawn if the relief sought has already been granted or the matter is rendered academic.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application is withdrawn as the relief sought has already been granted by the Deputy Registrar, rendering the suit academic.

Court disposition

Suit withdrawn

  • Suit withdrawn with no order as to costs
  • Each party to bear their own costs

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 8 December 2015

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 8 December 2015

george kalistus mtenda vs oiko credit ua another 2015 tzhclandd 20 8 december 2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)

AT MBEYA MISCELLANEOUS LAND CASE NO. 31 OF 2015

GEORGE KALISTUS MTENDA RESPONDENTS

VERSUS OIKO CREDIT U.A 1st RESPONDENT JAGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED 2nd RESPONDENT

ORDER Date: 08.12.2015 Coram: Hon A. F. Ngwala, J Applicant: Present For the Applicant: Mr. Mashauri Charles (Advocate) For the 1st Respondent: Mr. Mapunda G. (Advocate) 2nd Respondent: Present For the 2nd Respondent: Unrepresented B/C: Japhet Mr. Mashauri: Madame Judge, on 14 August, 2015, we secured an Order from the Deputy Registrar, requiring for Decree holder (the 1st Respondent) to release the Applicant’s properties which were not submitted as collateral. Instead they were ordered to proceed with properties submitted as collateral in the loan l Agreement. Madame Judge in the event we see this application has been overtaken by events because we were seeking the order which has already been issued by the Deputy Registrar. Mr. Mapunda: Madame Judge, it is true that we have an Order from the Deputy Registrar as submitted by the advocate for the Applicant. I agree with the prayer. We therefore pray that the matter be withdrawn. Order: As this matter has been overtaken by events as conceded by the respective learned counsels for the parties, Accordingly this suit is withdrawn with no orders as to costs. That is each party shall bear his or her own costs. 2

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

No structured authorities are available for this judgment.

Refer to the full judgment and official source for citations that have not yet been extracted.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.