george kalistus mtenda vs oiko credit ua another 2015 tzhclandd 20 8 december 2015
- Citation
- george kalistus mtenda vs oiko credit ua another 2015 tzhclandd 20 8 december 2015
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 8 December 2015
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case / Order on Withdrawal of Suit
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 8 December 2015
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Case / Order on Withdrawal of Suit
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application is withdrawn as the relief sought has already been granted by the Deputy Registrar, rendering the suit academic.
Court disposition
Suit withdrawn
Orders
- Suit withdrawn with no order as to costs
- Each party to bear their own costs
02
Material facts
Parties
George Kalistus Mtenda
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Mashauri CharlesOiko Credit U.A
1st Respondent Counsel: Mr. Mapunda G.Jagro Enterprises Limited
2nd Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Land Case / Order on Withdrawal of Suit
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the application for release of non-collateral properties is still maintainable after the Deputy Registrar's order
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The application has been overtaken by events as the Deputy Registrar has already issued the order sought, releasing properties not submitted as collateral.
- Respondent
- The 1st Respondent concurs that the Deputy Registrar's order has addressed the matter and agrees to withdrawal.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Court practice
A suit may be withdrawn if the relief sought has already been granted or the matter is rendered academic.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application is withdrawn as the relief sought has already been granted by the Deputy Registrar, rendering the suit academic.
Court disposition
Suit withdrawn
- Suit withdrawn with no order as to costs
- Each party to bear their own costs
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 8 December 2015
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 8 December 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)
AT MBEYA MISCELLANEOUS LAND CASE NO. 31 OF 2015
GEORGE KALISTUS MTENDA RESPONDENTS
VERSUS OIKO CREDIT U.A 1st RESPONDENT JAGRO ENTERPRISES LIMITED 2nd RESPONDENT
ORDER Date: 08.12.2015 Coram: Hon A. F. Ngwala, J Applicant: Present For the Applicant: Mr. Mashauri Charles (Advocate) For the 1st Respondent: Mr. Mapunda G. (Advocate) 2nd Respondent: Present For the 2nd Respondent: Unrepresented B/C: Japhet Mr. Mashauri: Madame Judge, on 14 August, 2015, we secured an Order from the Deputy Registrar, requiring for Decree holder (the 1st Respondent) to release the Applicant’s properties which were not submitted as collateral. Instead they were ordered to proceed with properties submitted as collateral in the loan l Agreement. Madame Judge in the event we see this application has been overtaken by events because we were seeking the order which has already been issued by the Deputy Registrar. Mr. Mapunda: Madame Judge, it is true that we have an Order from the Deputy Registrar as submitted by the advocate for the Applicant. I agree with the prayer. We therefore pray that the matter be withdrawn. Order: As this matter has been overtaken by events as conceded by the respective learned counsels for the parties, Accordingly this suit is withdrawn with no orders as to costs. That is each party shall bear his or her own costs. 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.