george m kilindu vs crdb 1996 ltd another 2000 tzhc 41 7 june 2000

george m kilindu vs crdb 1996 ltd another 2000 tzhc 41 7 june 2000

The Board of Directors' decision to retrench the applicant was null and void for violating the principle of natural justice by denying him the right to be heard on allegations affecting his employment. However, reinstatement was not ordered due to the abolition of the applicant's post and passage of time; monetary compensation was recommended instead.

Citation
george m kilindu vs crdb 1996 ltd another 2000 tzhc 41 7 june 2000
Parties
Applicant: George M. Kilindu; Respondent: CRDB (1996) Ltd.; Respondent: Another
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
7 June 2000
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Certiorari and Mandamus
Outcome
Application partly allowed and partly dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Natural Justice, Retrenchment, Right to Be Heard, Right to Work, Discretion in Judicial Review
Source Language
English
Administrative Law Employment Law Constitutional Law Natural Justice Retrenchment Right to Be Heard Right to Work Discretion in Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

George M. Kilindu

Applicant

CRDB (1996) Ltd.

Respondent

Another

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Civil Cause / Ruling on Application for Certiorari and Mandamus

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was denied the right to be heard before retrenchment
  2. 2 Whether the Board of Directors' decision was tainted by bias and violated principles of natural justice
  3. 3 Whether reinstatement or compensation is the appropriate remedy

Ratio Decidendi

The Board of Directors' decision to retrench the applicant was null and void for violating the principle of natural justice by denying him the right to be heard on allegations affecting his employment. However, reinstatement was not ordered due to the abolition of the applicant's post and passage of time; monetary compensation was recommended instead.

Court Disposition

Application partly allowed and partly dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Decision of the Board of Directors quashed for violation of natural justice.
  • No order for reinstatement; monetary compensation recommended.