george peter scordoulius vs everest freight ltd others 2019 tzhc 250 20 december 2019
Application struck out due to failure to specify property and its estimated value as required by Order XXXVI Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Code.
- Citation
- george peter scordoulius vs everest freight ltd others 2019 tzhc 250 20 december 2019
- Parties
- Applicant: George Peter Scordoulius; Respondent: Everest Freight Limited; Respondent: Ali Said; Respondent: Ahamed Said
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Attachment Before Judgment
- Outcome
- application struck out
- Legal Topics
- Attachment Before Judgment, Procedural Requirements, Ex Parte Hearing
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
George Peter Scordoulius
Applicant
Everest Freight Limited
Respondent
Ali Said
Respondent
Ahamed Said
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Application for Attachment Before Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order of attachment before judgment under Order XXXVI Rule 6 of the Civil Procedure Code
- 2 Whether the applicant specified the property and its value as required by law
Ratio Decidendi
Application struck out due to failure to specify property and its estimated value as required by Order XXXVI Rule 6(2) of the Civil Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
application struck out
Orders
- application struck out for want of legal requirement
- no order as to costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment