eugene v usa and anor communication 37 of 1990 1990 achpr 6 28 april 1990
The communication is inadmissible because it is directed against states that are not parties to the African Charter.
- Citation
- eugene v usa and anor communication 37 of 1990 1990 achpr 6 28 april 1990
- Parties
- Applicant: Georges Eugene; Respondent: USA; Respondent: Haiti
- Court
- ACHPR
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 1990
- Procedural Posture
- Communication / Admissibility Decision
- Outcome
- communication declared inadmissible
- Legal Topics
- Admissibility of Communications, Jurisdiction of the African Commission
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1
Parties
Georges Eugene
Applicant
USA
Respondent
Haiti
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Communication / Admissibility Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the African Commission has jurisdiction over communications against states not party to the African Charter
Ratio Decidendi
The communication is inadmissible because it is directed against states that are not parties to the African Charter.
Court Disposition
communication declared inadmissible
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment