scanned CASE NO 24149 OF 2024
- Citation
- scanned CASE NO 24149 OF 2024
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2024
- Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 1 January 2024
- Posture
- Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants was defective as it was verified by the plaintiff, not by the defendants themselves, contravening mandatory procedural requirements.
Court disposition
objection sustained, Written Statement of Defense struck out with costs
Orders
- Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants struck out
- Costs awarded to the plaintiff
02
Material facts
Parties
Gerald Gregory Likena
Plaintiff Counsel: Andrew MiraaThe Attorney General
1st DefendantCommissioner for Lands
2nd DefendantRegistrar of Titles
3rd DefendantKinondoni Municipal Council
4th DefendantThe Registered Trustees of the Heaven on Earth Ministries International
5th DefendantNoeltemaeli Mununa
6th DefendantAmounts and remedies
- Costs: 0
03
Procedural history
Posture
Land Case / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants is defective for being verified by a person who is not a party to the defense
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants is defective as it was verified by Gerald Gregory Likena, the plaintiff, contrary to Order VI Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019.
- Respondent
- The 5th and 6th defendants conceded to the objection and sought leave to refile another Written Statement of Defense.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Order VI Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019
Verification of pleadings must be done by a party to the pleading.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants was defective as it was verified by the plaintiff, not by the defendants themselves, contravening mandatory procedural requirements.
Court disposition
objection sustained, Written Statement of Defense struck out with costs
- Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants struck out
- Costs awarded to the plaintiff
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 1 January 2024
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 1 January 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)
AT PAR ES SALAAM LAND CASE NO. 24149 OF 2024 GERALD GREGORY LIKENA.................................... PLAINTIFF
VERSUS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.................................... 1st DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER FOR LANDS................................................... 2ndDEFENDANT REGISTRAR OF TITLES............................................................ 3rdDEFENDANT KINONDONI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL.......................................... 4thDEFENDANT
THE REGISTERED TRUSTEES OF THE HEAVEN ON EARTH MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL..................................................5thDEFENDANT NOELTEMAELI MUNUNA..........................................6th DEFENDANT
RULING Date of Last Order: 13.11.2024 Date of Ruling: 27.11.2024 T.N, MWENEGOHA, J The Ruling is in respect of two Preliminary Objections raised by the plaintiff that, the Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants is defective for being verified by another person, one Gerald Gregory Likena who is a plaintiff herein. The counsel for the plaintiff, Mr. Andrew Miraa, insisted in his submissions that, the Written Statement of Defense filed by the 5th and 6th defendants, contravenes the mandatory provisions of Order VI Rule 15 of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 i R.E 2019. The 5th and 6th defendants on their part, conceded to the objection and sought for leave of this Court to refile another Written Statement of Defence. In determining this objection, I will not take much of this Court's time, I sustain the objection raised by the counsel for the plaintiff as the 5th & 6th defendants has conceded to the same. I proceed to strike out from the records the Written Statement of Defence filed by the 5th and 6th defendants with costs. Ordered accordingly. Judge 27/11/2024 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.