gesero chacha kengwena vs sarah chacha obogo and 2 others 2022 tzhc 13487 30 september 2022
The appellant failed to prove ownership of the disputed land by evidence or proper description, and the evidence suggested abandonment of the land, with respondents in possession for a long period. The visit to the locus in quo did not prejudice the appellant as he participated. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
- Citation
- gesero chacha kengwena vs sarah chacha obogo and 2 others 2022 tzhc 13487 30 september 2022
- Parties
- Appellant: Gesero Chacha Keng'wena; 1st Respondent: Sarah Chacha Obogo; 2nd Respondent: Chacha Chacha Obogo; 3rd Respondent: Ghati Chacha Obogo
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Inheritance of Land, Locus in Quo Procedure, Burden of Proof, Description of Suit Land
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gesero Chacha Keng'wena
Appellant
Sarah Chacha Obogo
1st Respondent
Chacha Chacha Obogo
2nd Respondent
Ghati Chacha Obogo
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant proved ownership of the disputed land
- 2 Whether the trial tribunal erred in law and fact in its findings
- 3 Whether the visit to the locus in quo was prejudicial to the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to prove ownership of the disputed land by evidence or proper description, and the evidence suggested abandonment of the land, with respondents in possession for a long period. The visit to the locus in quo did not prejudice the appellant as he participated. The appeal lacked merit and was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment