20070220 TZHC Dar es Salaam
The Tribunal's finding that the keys were returned and the premises vacated was based on the credibility of witnesses, which the appellate court will not disturb. The absence of a written contract does not mean there was no agreement. The Tribunal was justified in not visiting the locus in quo as it was not necessary. All grounds of appeal lacked merit.
- Citation
- 20070220 TZHC Dar es Salaam
- Parties
- Appellant: Gido Muba; Respondent: Philipo Anthony Mallya
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 20 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Tenancy, Vacant Possession, Termination of Tenancy, Oral Contracts, Tribunal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gido Muba
Appellant
Philipo Anthony Mallya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenancy contract between the parties was terminated
- 2 Whether the respondent handed over the keys and vacated the premises
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in not visiting the locus in quo
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's finding that the keys were returned and the premises vacated was based on the credibility of witnesses, which the appellate court will not disturb. The absence of a written contract does not mean there was no agreement. The Tribunal was justified in not visiting the locus in quo as it was not necessary. All grounds of appeal lacked merit.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- Costs awarded to respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment