glory semu alias glory l ndanshau vs joseph j makiponya another 2022 tzhclandd 856 31 august 2022

glory semu alias glory l ndanshau vs joseph j makiponya another 2022 tzhclandd 856 31 august 2022

The alleged illegalities are not apparent on the face of the record and require evidence or long drawn argument; therefore, the applicant has not shown sufficient cause for extension of time.

Citation
glory semu alias glory l ndanshau vs joseph j makiponya another 2022 tzhclandd 856 31 august 2022
Parties
Applicant: Glory Semu alias Glory L. Ndanshau; 1st Respondent: Joseph J. Makiponya; 2nd Respondent: Leonard S. Ndanshau
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 August 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Revision, Illegality as Ground for Extension, Res Judicata, Matrimonial Property
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Revision Illegality as Ground for Extension Res Judicata Matrimonial Property

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Glory Semu alias Glory L. Ndanshau

Applicant

Joseph J. Makiponya

1st Respondent

Leonard S. Ndanshau

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant has shown sufficient cause for extension of time to file revision out of time
  2. 2 Whether alleged illegalities are apparent on the face of the record

Ratio Decidendi

The alleged illegalities are not apparent on the face of the record and require evidence or long drawn argument; therefore, the applicant has not shown sufficient cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

application dismissed