20120301 TZCA Dar es Salaam

20120301 TZCA Dar es Salaam

The application for extension of time is allowed on the basis that the alleged illegality of the High Court order—striking out the counterclaim for failure to furnish security for appearance—warrants the Court's intervention to ascertain and, if established, rectify the illegality.

Citation
20120301 TZCA Dar es Salaam
Parties
Applicant: Godfrey Emmanuel Malassya; Applicant: City Christian Fellowship; Respondent: Prosper Rweyendera
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 March 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application allowed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Leave to Appeal, Security for Appearance, Striking Out Counterclaim, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Emmanuel Malassya

Applicant

City Christian Fellowship

Applicant

Prosper Rweyendera

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 Whether sufficient cause exists to grant extension of time to file application for leave to appeal
  2. 2 Whether illegality of the impugned High Court order justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time is allowed on the basis that the alleged illegality of the High Court order—striking out the counterclaim for failure to furnish security for appearance—warrants the Court's intervention to ascertain and, if established, rectify the illegality.

Court Disposition

Application allowed with costs

Orders

  • Applicants to file application for leave to appeal within fourteen (14) days of delivery of this ruling