godfrey mlassy vs prosper rweyendera another 2022 tzhclandd 376 31 may 2022

godfrey mlassy vs prosper rweyendera another 2022 tzhclandd 376 31 may 2022

Applicant failed to account for the period of delay after withdrawal of notice of appeal and before filing the application; absence of explanation renders the application devoid of merit despite alleged illegality.

Citation
godfrey mlassy vs prosper rweyendera another 2022 tzhclandd 376 31 may 2022
Parties
Applicant: Godfrey Mlassy; Respondent: Prosper Rweyendera; Respondent: City Christian Fellowship
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 May 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Review, Illegality as Ground for Extension
Source Language
English
Civil Procedure Land Law Extension of Time Review Illegality as Ground for Extension

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Godfrey Mlassy

Applicant

Prosper Rweyendera

Respondent

City Christian Fellowship

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether sufficient cause exists to extend time for review application
  2. 2 whether alleged illegality justifies extension of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to account for the period of delay after withdrawal of notice of appeal and before filing the application; absence of explanation renders the application devoid of merit despite alleged illegality.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • application dismissed
  • costs awarded to respondents