goodluck mandes vs university of dodoma and others 2021 tzhc 5555 2 august 2021
The applicant failed to establish that the University of Dodoma Senate acted outside its mandate or breached procedural fairness. The discontinuation was an automatic result of the applicant's GPA falling below the required minimum, as per the university regulations. There was no evidence of denial of the right to be heard or failure to provide reasons, and the relevant regulations were properly applied. The application for certiorari and mandamus was therefore without merit.
- Citation
- goodluck mandes vs university of dodoma and others 2021 tzhc 5555 2 august 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Goodluck Mandes; 1st Respondent: The University of Dodoma; 2nd Respondent: The Chairman of the Senate of the University of Dodoma; 3rd Respondent: The Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic Research and Consultancy; 4th Respondent: The Principal of College of Earth Sciences Engineering, The University of Dodoma; 5th Respondent: Hon. Attorney General
- Court
- TZHC
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 2 August 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Civil Cause (judicial Review) / Ruling on Application for Certiorari and Mandamus
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Certiorari, Mandamus, Natural Justice, University Regulations, Procedural Fairness
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Goodluck Mandes
Applicant
The University of Dodoma
1st Respondent
The Chairman of the Senate of the University of Dodoma
2nd Respondent
The Deputy Vice Chancellor Academic Research and Consultancy
3rd Respondent
The Principal of College of Earth Sciences Engineering, The University of Dodoma
4th Respondent
Hon. Attorney General
5th Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Civil Cause (judicial Review) / Ruling on Application for Certiorari and Mandamus
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the University of Dodoma Senate breached its regulations in discontinuing the applicant
- 2 Whether the applicant was denied the right to be heard or reasons for the decision
- 3 Whether the decision to discontinue the applicant was ultra vires or procedurally unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish that the University of Dodoma Senate acted outside its mandate or breached procedural fairness. The discontinuation was an automatic result of the applicant's GPA falling below the required minimum, as per the university regulations. There was no evidence of denial of the right to be heard or failure to provide reasons, and the relevant regulations were properly applied. The application for certiorari and mandamus was therefore without merit.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Application for orders of certiorari and mandamus dismissed.
- Applicant to pay costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment