gordian pastory vs republic 1986 tzca 49 29 november 1986
The conviction could not be sustained due to unreliable and insufficient evidence, and exculpatory statements by co-accused could not be used against the appellant.
- Citation
- gordian pastory vs republic 1986 tzca 49 29 november 1986
- Parties
- Appellant: Gordian Wastory; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- TZCA
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 1986
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Evidence Assessment, Appeal Procedure
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Gordian Wastory
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Final Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the conviction for murder was supported by credible evidence
- 2 Whether statements by co-accused could be used against the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction could not be sustained due to unreliable and insufficient evidence, and exculpatory statements by co-accused could not be used against the appellant.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- conviction quashed
- sentence set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment