Grace George Lusinde vs Thaker Singh

Grace George Lusinde vs Thaker Singh

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent lacked locus standi or that procedural irregularities occasioned injustice; the settlement deed was validly executed and adopted as decree; regulation 18 was inapplicable as parties settled outside tribunal.

Citation
Grace George Lusinde vs Thaker Singh
Parties
Applicant: Grace George Lusinde; Respondent: Thaker Singh
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 1996
Procedural Posture
Land Revision / Ruling
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
Revision of Tribunal Proceedings, Locus Standi, Settlement Deed Validity, Attestation of Documents, Conflict of Interest
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Grace George Lusinde

Applicant

Thaker Singh

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Revision / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the respondent had locus standi to institute the application before the tribunal
  2. 2 Whether the deed of settlement was validly executed and attested
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's advocate had a conflict of interest in attesting and representing

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to prove that the respondent lacked locus standi or that procedural irregularities occasioned injustice; the settlement deed was validly executed and adopted as decree; regulation 18 was inapplicable as parties settled outside tribunal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Application dismissed
  • Costs awarded to respondent