GSM ANOTHER VS ZANZIBAR INSURANCE CORPORATION CIVIL CASE NO

GSM ANOTHER VS ZANZIBAR INSURANCE CORPORATION CIVIL CASE NO

The deed of settlement reached by the parties through mediation is lawful and satisfies the requirements of Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code; it is therefore recorded and adopted as the consent judgment, marking the matter as settled.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
GSM ANOTHER VS ZANZIBAR INSURANCE CORPORATION CIVIL CASE NO
Parties
Plaintiff: GSM GROUP LTD; Plaintiff: GSM FOAM COMPANY LIMITED; Defendant: ZANZIBAR INSURANCE CORPORATION
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
1 January 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Consent Judgment
Outcome
matter settled by consent judgment
Legal Topics
Settlement, Indemnity, Specific Performance, Damages, Mediation
Source Language
en
Insurance Contract Civil Procedure Settlement Indemnity Specific Performance Damages Mediation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GSM GROUP LTD

Plaintiff

GSM FOAM COMPANY LIMITED

Plaintiff

ZANZIBAR INSURANCE CORPORATION

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Consent Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant is liable to pay the outstanding indemnity amount under the insurance contract
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to damages and other reliefs as claimed
  3. 3 Whether the deed of settlement should be recorded as a consent judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The deed of settlement reached by the parties through mediation is lawful and satisfies the requirements of Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code; it is therefore recorded and adopted as the consent judgment, marking the matter as settled.

Court Disposition

matter settled by consent judgment

Orders

  • Deed of settlement recorded and adopted as consent judgment and decree of the court
  • Defendant to pay plaintiffs TZS 9,431,730,155 in monthly installments of TZS 1,000,000,000 from December 2024 to September 2025