Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

Gurtu Sirro v Republic

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The applicant established good cause for delay in appealing due to his transfer between prison camps, supported by affidavits and official records, warranting extension of time to appeal.

Court disposition

Application granted

Orders

  • Extension of time granted to Gurtu Sirro to lodge his petition of appeal within forty-five days from the date of the ruling

02

Material facts

Parties

Gurtu Sirro

Applicant

The Republic

Respondent Counsel: Ms Anifa Ally

Amounts and remedies

  • Extension Period Granted (days): 45

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the applicant has shown good cause for extension of time to appeal out of time

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicant argued that he was delayed in appealing to the High Court due to being transferred to different prison camps after lodging his notice of intention to appeal.
Respondent
The respondent, through State Attorney Ms Anifa Ally, conceded that the applicant's transfer between prison camps constituted good cause for extension of time.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Mwantandu Eliah v R, Criminal Appeal 477 of 2007

    Good cause for extension of time includes circumstances beyond the applicant's control, such as transfer between prison camps.

  2. 02

    Nzeyimana s/o Zeno v Republic (Criminal Appeal 458 of 2007) [2013] TZCA 380

    Supporting affidavits and official records can establish good cause for delay in filing appeals.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The applicant established good cause for delay in appealing due to his transfer between prison camps, supported by affidavits and official records, warranting extension of time to appeal.

Court disposition

Application granted

  • Extension of time granted to Gurtu Sirro to lodge his petition of appeal within forty-five days from the date of the ruling

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 24 September 2024

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 24 September 2024

Gurtu Sirro v Republic

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA IN THE SUB-REGISTRY OF MANYARA

AT BABATI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 18323 OF 2024 (Originated from Economic Case No. 08 of2023 in Babati District Court at Babati) GURTU SIRRO......................................................................................APPELLANT

VERSUS THE REPUBLIC................................................................................ RESPONDENT

RULING MIRINDO, J.: 24h September, 2024 Gurtu Sirro was convicted and sentenced by Babati District Court on 13 June 2023. He lodged his written notice of intention to appeal to the High Court on 14 June 2023. He was thereafter transferred to different prison camps and delayed in appealing to the High Court. He is now before this Court with an application for leave to appeal out of time. I have gone through the applicant's arguments, his supporting affidavit, the supplementary affidavit of the Babati District Prison Officer, Nahman Waziri Koko, and going through the arguments by the learned State Attorney, Ms Anifa 1 Ally for the Respondent, Republic. I am satisfied that the applicant has established good cause to be granted extension of time to appeal out of time. It is clear that the applicant lodged his written notice of intention to appeal on 14/6/2023 which has been filed in trial court's record. It is also clear that the applicant has been subjected to transfer to different prison camps as evidenced by himself and the prisoner officer in Babati District Prison. As correctly argued by the learned State Attorney, Ms Ally, these grounds constitute good cause for extension of time. This is clear from the decision of the Court of Appeal in Mwantandu Eliah v R, Criminal Appeal 477 of 2007. This position is also supported by the case of Nzeyimana s/o Zeno v Republic (Criminal Appeal 458 of 2007) [2013] TZCA 380 (19 April 2013) cited by the learned State Attorney, Ms Ally. For these reasons, Gurtu Sirro is granted extension of time to lodge his petition of appeal within forty-five days from the date of this Ruling. DATED at BABATI this 24th day of September, 2024 M. MIRINDO

JUDGE 2 COURT: Ruling delivered in chambers this 24th day of September, 2024 in the presence of the applicant in person and in the presence of Ms Anifa Ally, State Attorney for the Respondent, Republic. B/C William Makori (RMA) present. F.M. MIRINDO

JUDGE 3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Mwantandu Eliah v R, Criminal Appeal 477 of 2007

Case cited

Nzeyimana s/o Zeno v Republic (Criminal Appeal 458 of 2007) [2013] TZCA 380

Case cited

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.