Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TZHCCOMD

habib african bank ltd vs bareto haulers t ltd 2 others 2022 tzhccomd 377 17 november 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found the deed of settlement to be lawfully executed and in accordance with the law, and therefore adopted it as a consent judgment, marking the matter as settled with the settlement deed forming part of the decree.

Court disposition

Suit marked settled by consent judgment per settlement deed.

Orders

  • Deed of settlement recorded and adopted as part of the consent judgment.
  • Outstanding debt acknowledged as USD 104,570.10; settlement amount agreed at USD 80,000 or TZS 188,400,000.
  • Defendants to pay settlement amount in structured installments as specified in the deed, with no interest accruing during repayment period.
  • Securities remain in force until full payment.
  • Upon default, plaintiff may enforce securities and guarantees or execute decree without recourse to court.
  • All other claims between parties waived except as provided in the settlement deed.
  • Settlement deed to have effect as a court decree.

02

Material facts

Parties

Habib African Bank Limited

Plaintiff Counsel: Tazan Mwaiteleke

Bareto Haulers (T) Limited

1st Defendant Counsel: Richard Rudolf Lawrence Barreto (in person and for all defendants)

Jude Terence Joseph Bareto

2nd Defendant Counsel: Richard Rudolf Lawrence Barreto (in person and for all defendants)

Richard Rudolf Lawrence Bareto

3rd Defendant Counsel: Richard Rudolf Lawrence Barreto (in person and for all defendants)

Amounts and remedies

  • Outstanding Debt: USD 104,570.1
  • Settlement Amount (usd): USD 80,000
  • Settlement Amount (tzs): TZS 188,400,000
  • Monthly Installment Year 1: TZS 2,000,000
  • Monthly Installment Year 2: TZS 3,000,000
  • Monthly Installment Year 3: TZS 4,000,000
  • Monthly Installment Year 4: TZS 5,000,000
  • Monthly Installment Year 5 (first 3 Months): TZS 6,000,000
  • Final Installment (50th): TZS 2,400,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Commercial Case / Consent Judgment After Settlement Deed Filed

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Plaintiff argued that the parties had mutually signed and filed a settlement deed stipulating agreed terms and prayed for the matter to be marked as settled per the deed, which should form part of the consent judgment.
Respondent
3rd defendant, on behalf of all defendants, supported the plaintiff's submission and agreed to the settlement and its terms.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code

    Where a suit is wholly or partly adjusted by lawful agreement or compromise, the court shall record such agreement and pass a decree in accordance therewith.

  2. 02

    Jaffrey Indi. Sian Ltd vs M/s Beijing Construction Engineering Group Limited, Commercial Case No 38 of 2021

    Settlement of disputes by mutual agreement is encouraged by the courts.

  3. 03

    Motor Vessel Sepideh and another vs. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil Application No.237 of 2013, CAT

    A consent judgment based on a settlement deed is enforceable as a decree of the court.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found the deed of settlement to be lawfully executed and in accordance with the law, and therefore adopted it as a consent judgment, marking the matter as settled with the settlement deed forming part of the decree.

Obiter and limits

  • Disposal of cases by settlement is a mode encouraged by the court and globally.
  • The settlement deed does not alter or affect the securities and guarantees executed for the credit facility, which remain in force until full payment.

Court disposition

Suit marked settled by consent judgment per settlement deed.

  • Deed of settlement recorded and adopted as part of the consent judgment.
  • Outstanding debt acknowledged as USD 104,570.10; settlement amount agreed at USD 80,000 or TZS 188,400,000.
  • Defendants to pay settlement amount in structured installments as specified in the deed, with no interest accruing during repayment period.
  • Securities remain in force until full payment.
  • Upon default, plaintiff may enforce securities and guarantees or execute decree without recourse to court.
  • All other claims between parties waived except as provided in the settlement deed.
  • Settlement deed to have effect as a court decree.

Source and reliance status

TZHCCOMD · 17 November 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TZHCCOMD

Judgment· 17 November 2022

habib african bank ltd vs bareto haulers t ltd 2 others 2022 tzhccomd 377 17 november 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION)

ATDAR ES SALAAM COMMERCIAL CASE NO. 76 OF 2022 HABIB AFRICAN BANK LIMITED........................................... PLAINTIFF

VERSUS BARETO HAULERS (T) LIMITED................................... lst DEFENDANT JUDE TERENCE JOSEPH BARETO................................. 2nd DEFENDANT RICHARD RUDOLF LAWRENCE BARETO..................... 3rd DEFENDANT

CONSENTJUDGEMENT Date of last order: 15/11/2022 Date of judgement: 17/11/2022 A.AMBAGWAJ. This judgment arises from a deed of settlement duly signed by the parties and filed in this court on 17th November, 2022. The plaintiff, HABIB AFRICAN BANK LIMITED instituted the present suit against the defendants namely, BARETO HAULERS (T) LIMITED, JUDE TERENCE JOSEPH BARETO, RICHARD RUDOLF LAWRENCE BARETTO, herein referred to as the lst, 2nd and 3rd defendants respectively. The plaintiff prays for judgment and decree against the defendant jointly and severally as follows; i. A declaration that the defendants are in breach of credit agreement as constituted under the term loan facility and thus the plaintiff is entitled to realize the securities pleaded under paragraph 15 and 16 of the plaint and which are liable for enforcement for the full repayment of the outstanding credit facility extended to the lst defendant. ii. Payment of US$ 105,692.74. only as pleaded in paragraphs 5 and 17 of the plaint. iii. Payment of commercial interest at 23% per annum of the amount due of US$ 105,692.74 only from the date it was due to the date of judgement. iv. Payment of interest on the decretal sum at the court's rate from the date of judgement until payment in full. v. Costs of this suit. vi. Any other orders and reliefs may this honorable court deem fit and just to grant. Upon completion of

pleadings, the matter was set for mention on 10th November, 2022 at 09:00hrs. Gladly, on 9th day of November, 2022, the parties reached an agreement to settle matter amicably as such, they filed in this court a deed of settlement wholly adjusting the suit. Consequently, this court summoned the parties to appear on 1701 November, 2022 for necessary orders. When the matter was called on before the court, Mr. Tazan Mwaiteleke, learned advocate appeared for the plaintiff whereas the 3rd defendant Mr. Richard Rudolf Lawrence Barreto, appeared in person and on behalf of the lst and 2nd defendants. Mr. Tazan Mwaiteleke informed the court that parties had mutually signed and filed the settlement deed stipulating the terms upon which they agreed. He thus prayed the court to mark the matter as settled as per the terms and conditions stipulated in the settlement deed and the same to form part of the consent judgment. The submission and prayer of the plaintiff's counsel was supported by the 3rd defendant one Mr. Richard Rudolf Lawrence Barreto on behalf of all the defendants. 3 Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code under which this the settlement deed was filed provides as follows; Where it is proved to the satisfaction of the court that a suit has been adjusted whoiiy or in part by any iawfui agreement or compromise, or where the defendant satisfies the piaintiffin respect ofthe

whoie or any part ofthe subject matter of the suit, the court shaii order such agreement, compromise or satisfaction to be recorded, and shaii pass a decree in accordance therewith so faras itreiates to the suit'. I have keenly gone through the said deed of settlement filed in this court on 17th November, 2022 in terms of Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code and rule 2(2) of the High Court (Commercial Division) Procedure Rules. I am satisfied that the deed of settlement was on 17th November, 2022 duly signed by both parties namely, Mr. Herman Lameck, Head of Credit for the Plaintiff and Syed Muktar Sibtain, the Company Secretary for plaintiff, on the one hand and Mr. Richard Barreto, the Director for the lst defendant and Jude Terence Barreto, the Director for lst defendant, on the other hand. Additionally, I have scanned the terms and conditions of the settlement deed and found that they are in consonance with the law. Undeniably, disposal of cases by settlement is one of the modes which is mostly encouraged by the court. In the case of Jaffrey Indi. Sian Ltd vs M/s Beijing Construction Engineering Group Limited, Commercial Case No 38 of 2021, this court remarked that parties' mutual settlement of cases is a route encouraged all over the world. The similar position has been echoed by the Court of Appeal in Motor Vessel Sepideh and another vs. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph

and two others Civil Application No.237 of 2013, CAT at Dar- es- Salaam. In view of the above, the deed of settlement is hereby recorded and adopted to form part of the consent judgment. The matter is therefore marked settled with the following orders; 1. The outstanding amount of the debts: The lst defendant (borrower), other defendants and the plaintiff (bank) agree and acknowledge that the OUTSTANDING AMOUNT arising from the said credit facility is USD 104,570.10 (United States of America Dollars One Hundred and Four Thousand Five Hundred Seventy and Ten Cents) only herein after referred to as "the debt".

2. That for the purposes of this settlement deed, the plaintiff (bank) is agreeable to be paid USD 80,000.00 (United States of America Dollars eighty thousand) or its equivalent of TZS 188,400,000.00 (Tanzanian shillings one hundred eighty-eight million four hundred thousand) thousand) hereinafter "the settlement amount" in fully satisfaction of the debt by the defendants.

3. Securities: the defendants hereby acknowledge and agree that the securities shall continue to be security of the debt as provided herein and in security documents.

4. Payment Modalities and Interest: the parties agree that; (a)That, the borrower agrees, accepts unconditionally to allow the bank to convert the mutually agreed liability of US$ 80,000.0 into local currency liability at an exchange rate of Tshs. 2,355.0 [per dollar]. Further, borrower hereby agrees that the bank is dully authorized specifically to convert the liability of US$ 80,000 in equivalent local currency liability of TZS. 188,400,000.00 (Tanzanian Shillings one hundred eighty-eight million & four hundred thousand) (b)The lst defendant Barreto Hauliers [T] Limited 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant accept the settlement amount of Tsh. 188,400,000.0 (Tanzanian shillings one hundred eighty-eight million four hundred thousand) as full and final liability to be repayable at a monthly installment of Tshs.2,000,000.00 (Tanzania shillings two million) only without default in the l51 year starting from November 2022 up to October, 2023. (c) The l51 defendant Barreto Hauliers [T] Limited ,2nd defendant and 3rd defendant accept to enhance the instalment amount & shall commence paying at a monthly instalment of Tsh.3,OOO,OOO.OO (Tanzanian Shillings three million) only for complete 2nd year 6 the liability without default irrespective of economic condition, business landscape, commercial situation or trade activity. The 2nd year shall start from November, 2023 to October 2024. (d) The

lst defendant Barreto Hauliers, 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant accept to enhance the instalment amount and shall commence paying at a monthly instalment of Tsh. 4,000,000.00 (Tanzania Shillings four million) only for complete 3rd year subsequent to 2nd years payment [as cited under clause 5(C) to reduce the liability without default irrespective of economic scenario, business development, commercial situation or trade activity. (e) The lst defendant Barreto Hauliers [T] Limited, 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant accept to enhance the instalment amount & shall commence paying a monthly instalment of Tsh. 5,000,000.00 (Tanzania Shillings four million) for complete 4th year subsequent payments [as cited under clause 5 (d)] to reduce the liability without default irrespective of economic scenario, business development, commercial situation or trade activity. The 4th year shall start from November 2025 to October 2026. (f) The lst defendant Barreto Hauliers [T] Limited, 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant accept to enhance the instalment amount & shall commence paying at a monthly instalment of Tshs. 6,000,000.0 (Tanzania shillings six million) only commencing from 5th year [for three months] and final payment of Tsh.2.4 million as last instalment [50th instalment] to liquidate the liability without default 7 (Tanzania shillings six million) only commencing from 5th year [for three

months] and final payment of Tsh.2.4 million as last instalment [50th instalment] to liguidate the liability without default irrespective of economic scenario, business development, commercial situation or trade activity. The 5th year shall start from November 2026 to February 2027. (g) That, the settlement amount will not accrue any interest during the ensuring period of repayment. (h) That, the borrower shall have the right to liguidate the entire liability in lumpsum, in one go without any penalty. (i) That, in event of any single default in repayment of the settlement sum, this deed shall terminate forthwith. (j)That, upon default by defendants, the plaintiff shall have the powers to sell the securities and to enforce the directors guarantee to recover the outstanding liabilities without recourse to the court. (k)That upon default in any single instalment, the terms of this deed of settlement as a decree of the court shall become payable immediately and the plaintiff shall be at liberty to execute the decree as against the defendants lst 2nd and ,3rd in favour of the plaintiff to liquidate the outstanding amount or to sell herself under power of sale without assistance of the court. 8 I declared that this deed of settlement does not alter, change, vary or affect the security and guarantees executed as security for credit facilities advanced to the borrower and will remain

in full force and effect until the settlement sum is paid in full. (m) That immediately after filing of this deed of settlement this suit, Commercial Case No. 76 of 2022 shall be marked settled as per terms of this deed of settlement. (n) That the parties have willingly and fully negotiated this settlement and are in agreement to the settlement reached herein and that by this deed the matter is marked settled and that no further claim whatsoever pertaining to this settled matter emanating from credit facility advanced to the lst defendant and guaranteed by the personal guarantees (2nd and 3rd defendants) may be revived or reinstituted by any party. (o)That except as provided herein, the parties waive all other claims against each other and thus this deed of settlement shall constitute a decree of the court as between parties in respect of the dispute between them and the parties agree the court to record as such and should either of the parties hereto default in the performance of the terms herein it shall be enforced in the same manner as a decree of this court. (p)That upon the matter being marked settled between the plaintiff the l5* defendant, 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant, the settlement deed 9 of the terms herein it shall be enforced in the same manner as a decree of this court. (p)That upon the matter being marked settled between the plaintiff the lst defendant, 2nd defendant and 3rd defendant, the settlement deed shall have effect as if it is a decree of the court made after full hearing of the suit and delivery of judgement upon its terms. It is so ordered Dated at Dar es Salaam this 17th day of November, 2022. A.A. Mbagwa

JUDGE 17/11/2022 10

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Jaffrey Indi. Sian Ltd vs M/s Beijing Construction Engineering Group Limited, Commercial Case No 38 of 2021

Case cited

Motor Vessel Sepideh and another vs. Yusuph Mohamed Yusuph and two others Civil Application No.237 of 2013, CAT

Case cited

Order XXIII rule 3 of the Civil Procedure Code

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Rule 2(2) of the High Court (Commercial Division) Procedure Rules

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.