hadija michael vs rahma a nzungi 2024 tzhc 287 19 february 2024

hadija michael vs rahma a nzungi 2024 tzhc 287 19 february 2024

The Ward Tribunal was not properly constituted as required by law, with inconsistent quorum and lack of gender specification, rendering its proceedings and decision a nullity and depriving it of jurisdiction to try the case. The District Land and Housing Tribunal failed to address this illegality. The amendment to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
hadija michael vs rahma a nzungi 2024 tzhc 287 19 february 2024
Parties
Appellant: Hadija Michael; Respondent: Rahma A. Nzungi
Court
TZHC
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
19 February 2024
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal, Originating From Ward Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; proceedings and decisions of both District Land and Housing Tribunal and Ward Tribunal quashed and set aside.
Legal Topics
Tribunal Composition, Jurisdiction, Retrospective Application of Law, Procedural Irregularity
Source Language
english
Land Law Civil Procedure Tribunal Composition Jurisdiction Retrospective Application of Law Procedural Irregularity

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hadija Michael

Appellant

Rahma A. Nzungi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From District Land and Housing Tribunal, Originating From Ward Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the Ward Tribunal was properly constituted as required by law
  2. 2 Whether the Ward Tribunal had jurisdiction to pronounce judgment after the amendment of the law

Ratio Decidendi

The Ward Tribunal was not properly constituted as required by law, with inconsistent quorum and lack of gender specification, rendering its proceedings and decision a nullity and depriving it of jurisdiction to try the case. The District Land and Housing Tribunal failed to address this illegality. The amendment to the law did not retrospectively affect the case since substantive justice had been reached before the amendment's publication.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; proceedings and decisions of both District Land and Housing Tribunal and Ward Tribunal quashed and set aside.

Orders

  • Proceedings and decisions of District Land and Housing Tribunal and Kileo Ward Tribunal quashed and set aside.
  • Parties at liberty to refer dispute to a competent tribunal.