hamadi apatae vs iddi foroza 2020 tzhclandd 4018 20 august 2020

The appellant failed to establish lawful ownership or locus standi as required by law and evidence; the lower tribunals' findings were correct and based on the strength of evidence.

Citation: hamadi apatae vs iddi foroza 2020 tzhclandd 4018 20 august 2020
Parties: Appellant: Hamadi Apatae; Respondent: Iddi Foroza
Court: TANZLII
Jurisdiction: Tanzania
Judgment Date: 20 August 2020
Procedural Posture: Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Locus Standi, Ownership of Land, Administrator of Estate, Trespass, Evidence Evaluation
Source Language: English

Land Law Civil Procedure Locus Standi Ownership of Land Administrator of Estate Trespass Evidence Evaluation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Hamadi Apatae

Appellant

Iddi Foroza

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Land Appeal / Judgment on Second Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the appellant established lawful ownership of the disputed land
2 Whether the respondent had locus standi
3 Whether procedural irregularities affected the outcome

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to establish lawful ownership or locus standi as required by law and evidence; the lower tribunals' findings were correct and based on the strength of evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs