hamis athumani hamis others vs macfarlane msechu another 2021 tzhclandd 6849 15 december 2021
Applicants failed to account for the 90-day delay between the striking out of their previous application and the filing of the present application, and thus did not provide sufficient cause for extension of time.
- Citation
- hamis athumani hamis others vs macfarlane msechu another 2021 tzhclandd 6849 15 december 2021
- Parties
- Applicant: Hamis Athumani Hamis; Applicant: James Francis Mbatia; Applicant: Ally Ramadhani Mohamed Magana; Respondent: Macfarlane Msechu; Respondent: Merycelina Msechu
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Revision, Court Discretion, Delay in Filing, Natural Justice
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamis Athumani Hamis
Applicant
James Francis Mbatia
Applicant
Ally Ramadhani Mohamed Magana
Applicant
Macfarlane Msechu
Respondent
Merycelina Msechu
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Enlargement of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have adduced sufficient reasons for enlargement of time to file an application for revision
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants failed to account for the 90-day delay between the striking out of their previous application and the filing of the present application, and thus did not provide sufficient cause for extension of time.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- Application dismissed with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment