hamis idd yusuph vs republic 2022 tzhc 12392 31 march 2022
- Citation
- hamis idd yusuph vs republic 2022 tzhc 12392 31 march 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 31 March 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 31 March 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail in economic crime cases where the value of property involved is less than TZS 300,000,000; such applications must be made to the District Court or Court of Resident Magistrate.
Court disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Orders
- Applicant may file bail application in the District Court of Kondoa.
02
Material facts
Parties
Hamis Idd Yusuph
ApplicantThe Republic
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Value of Giraffe Skin: TZS 34,785,000
- Value of Impala Legs: TZS 2,713,230
- Value of Dikdik Leg: TZS 579,750
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in an economic crime case where the monetary value is below TZS 300,000,000
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant sought bail from the High Court in an economic crime case involving property valued below TZS 300,000,000.
- Respondent
- Respondent relied on statutory provisions restricting High Court jurisdiction for bail to cases involving property valued at TZS 300,000,000 and above.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 29(4)(a) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, [Cap. 200] as amended by Act No. 1 of 2022
Jurisdiction for bail in economic crimes is determined by the monetary value involved.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to grant bail in economic crime cases where the value of property involved is less than TZS 300,000,000; such applications must be made to the District Court or Court of Resident Magistrate.
Obiter and limits
- Applicant may file bail application in the District Court of Kondoa.
Court disposition
Application struck out for want of jurisdiction.
- Applicant may file bail application in the District Court of Kondoa.
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 31 March 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 31 March 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (DODOMA DISTRICT REGISTRY)
AT DODOMA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 71 OF 2021 (Originating from Economic Case No. 7 of 2021 Kondoa District Court) HAMIS IDD YUSUPH ....................................APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC........................... RESPONDENT
RULING By virtue of section 29(4) (a) of the Economic and Organised crimes Control Act, [Cap. 200] as amended vide Written Laws (Miscellaneous amendments) Act, 2022 (Act No. 1 of 2022) which came into force on the 8th day of March, 2022 this Court's jurisdiction on bail in respect of economic crimes pegged on monetary value is TZS 300,000,000/- and above. According to the charge sheet, the Applicant was allegedly found in possession of the Government trophies, Giraffe skin, impala legs and Dikdik leg valued TZS 34,785,000, TZS 2,713,230 and TZS 579,750 respectively. That is to say, the monetary value involved in the alleged crime is still below TZS 300,000,000/= for this Court to exercise its jurisdiction on this bail application visavis i the Applicant's prayer that his Application for bail be considered by the District Court of Kondoa at Kondoa. Thus, the Application for bail is hereby struck out of the Court for want of jurisdiction. The Applicant may wish to file his application for bail Jf any, in the District Court of Kondoa accordingly. This is because pursuant to section 29(4) (a) of the Economic and Organised Crime Control Act, [Cap. 200] as amended, the power to hear bail applications and grant bail between the arrest and the committal of accused for trial by the Court is hereby vested in the District Court and the Court of Resident Magistrate if the value of the property involved in the offence charged is less than three hundred million shillings. GEORGE M. MASAJU
JUDGE 31/3/2022 2
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.