hamis mbwana mwaveso kizozo anothe vs the republic r 2023 tzhc 23397 7 december 2023
- Citation
- hamis mbwana mwaveso kizozo anothe vs the republic r 2023 tzhc 23397 7 december 2023
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 7 December 2023
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TZHC
- Decision
- 7 December 2023
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The applicants are entitled to bail as the offences are bailable, there is no impediment to granting bail, and the applicants have shown willingness to comply with bail conditions. Bail is granted with conditions based on statutory requirements and the principle of proportionality among accused.
Court disposition
Bail granted with conditions
Orders
- Each applicant to deposit cash TZS 119,532,487 or Title Deed of equivalent value
- Each applicant to provide two reliable sureties with fixed abode in Dar es Salaam, each executing a bond of TZS 59,766,243
- Each surety to produce introductory letter from employer or local authorities and recognized identity card
- Applicants not to leave jurisdiction of Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu without permission
- Applicants to surrender passport and any travel documents to Resident Magistrate of Kisutu RMs court
- Applicants to appear in court as required until final determination of Economic case No 48 of 2023
- Applicants not to travel outside Dar es Salaam without written approval of Resident Magistrate assigned with the case
- Kisutu Resident Magistrate to verify sureties and bond documents
02
Material facts
Parties
Hamis Mbwana Mwaveso @ Kizozo
Applicant Counsel: Hardson B MchauYassir Mussa Hussein
Applicant Counsel: Hardson B MchauThe Republic
Respondent Counsel: Curthbert MbilingiAmounts and remedies
- Cash Deposit Per Applicant: TZS 119,532,487
- Bond Value Per Surety: TZS 59,766,243
03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Bail Application
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail under the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act
- 02
What bail conditions should be imposed in economic offences involving multiple accused
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicants are charged with bailable offences, have reliable sureties, and undertake to comply with bail conditions. Requested application of the principle of sharing for bail amount allocation.
- Respondent
- Did not oppose the application; requested the court to consider section 36(5) and (6) of the EOCCA in setting bail conditions.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General legal principle, Tanzanian Constitution and statutes
Bail is a statutory and constitutional right for an accused person, restricted only on reasonable grounds.
- 02
Section 36(5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E 2022; Lulu Victor Kayombo and another v R. Misc. Economic Application No 140 of 2021 (Unreported)
Bail conditions in economic offences require cash deposit or security of at least half the value involved, with the remainder executed by bond, and the amount is allotted equally among accused under the principle of proportionality.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The applicants are entitled to bail as the offences are bailable, there is no impediment to granting bail, and the applicants have shown willingness to comply with bail conditions. Bail is granted with conditions based on statutory requirements and the principle of proportionality among accused.
Obiter and limits
- Bail is to be granted where offences are bailable and there is no indication that granting bail would be detrimental to public safety or justice.
Court disposition
Bail granted with conditions
- Each applicant to deposit cash TZS 119,532,487 or Title Deed of equivalent value
- Each applicant to provide two reliable sureties with fixed abode in Dar es Salaam, each executing a bond of TZS 59,766,243
- Each surety to produce introductory letter from employer or local authorities and recognized identity card
- Applicants not to leave jurisdiction of Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu without permission
- Applicants to surrender passport and any travel documents to Resident Magistrate of Kisutu RMs court
- Applicants to appear in court as required until final determination of Economic case No 48 of 2023
- Applicants not to travel outside Dar es Salaam without written approval of Resident Magistrate assigned with the case
- Kisutu Resident Magistrate to verify sureties and bond documents
Source and reliance status
TZHC · 7 December 2023
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TZHC
Judgment· 7 December 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
DAR ES SALAAM DISTRICT REGISTRY
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 155 OF 2023 (Originating from Economic Crimes case No 28 of 2023 Kisutu RMs Court) 1. HAMIS MBWANA MWAVESO @ KIZOZO….……. APPLICANT 2. YASSIR MUSSA HUSSEIN…………………………. APPLICANT
VERSUS THE REPUBLIC………… ………………………………RESPONDENT
RULING 6 th & 7 th Dec 2023 MKWIZU, J: - The applicants HAMIS MBWANA MWAVESO @ KIZOZO AND YASSIR MUSSA HUSSEIN are together with twelve (12) others, not subject of this application are charged with nine (9) counts of economic offences in Economic crimes case No 28 of 2023 pending at Kisutu Resident Magistrate Court . This application was made under Section 29 (4) (d) and 36 (1) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act, Cap 200 R.E 2022 supported by an affidavit sworn by Hardson B Mchau, applicant counsel sworn on 2nd November 2023. Submitting in support of the application , Mr Hardson Mchau advocate argued that ,the applicants are facing a bailable offences ,they have reliable sureties to stand sureties and undertake to unconditionally comply with the bail conditions to be imposed by the court. The counsel has further implored the court to consider the principle of sharing basing on the amount disclosed in the charge sheet. Mr Curthbert Mbilingi, the learned state attorney for the respondent did not oppose the application. HE only implored the court to consider the provisions of section 36(5) and (6) of the EOCCA Cap 200 RE 2022 as a guide in setting the requested bail conditions. I have considered the supporting affidavit, the parties’ submissions, and the law. It is a clear position of our law that bail is both a statutory and constitutional right for an accused person
which is to be restricted only on reasonable grounds. And the governing rule is bail is to be granted where the offences are bailable and there is no any impediment whatsoever expressly or otherwise that would sufficiently convince the court that granting bail would be detrimental to the public safety or in any way interfere with the course of justice. In this case, there is no such indication, as stated, the leaned State Attorney was in support of the application. As deposed, and agreed upon by the respondents attorney, the applicants are charged with bailable offences. Their willingness to abide with the bail conditions to be imposed by the court is visibly shown in their affidavit promising to parade reliable sureties. I do not therefore find reasons to deny the applicant bail in this matter. Next is what should be the conditions. I have on this aspect revisited the charge sheet and the principle of sharing described in Lulu Victor Kayombo and another V R. Misc. Economic Application No 140 of 2021 (Unreported). Bail conditions are prescribed under Section 36 (5) and (6) of the Economic and Organized Crime Control Act [Cap 200 R.E 2022]. Subsection 5, among other things, requires the applicant to pay cash deposit or submit to court the security whose value is at least half of the value of the property or money involved. The rest of the value is required to be executed by bond. However, since the case involves 14 accused persons then, the amount will be allotted equally among the accused persons under the principle of proportionality On the premises, the applicant’s bail is granted on the following conditions: 1. The applicants shall each deposit cash TZS 119,532,487/= or a Title Deed of immovable properties certified to have a similar value or more.
2. The applicants must provide two reliable sureties with fixed abode in Dar es salaam who will execute a bond valued at TZS. 59,766,243/= each.
3. Each surety should produce an introductory letter from his or her employer or local authorities and a copy of recognized identity card.
4. The applicants should not leave the jurisdiction of the Resident Magistrate Court of Dar es Salaam at Kisutu without permission from the Resident Magistrate of Kisutu RMs court.
5. The applicants should surrender his passport, and any other traveling documents if any to the Resident Magistrate of Kisutu RMs court.
6. The applicants are compulsorily bound to appear in court at any time when required until the final determination of Economic case No 48 of 2023.
7. The applicants shall not travel outside Dar es salaam without a written approval of the resident Magistrate assigned with the case The Kisutu Resident Magistrate shall verify the sureties and bond documents. Order accordingly. Dated at Dare es salaam, this 7th Day of December 2023 accordingly. E. Y Mkwizu Judge 7/12/2023
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.