hamisi juma vs republic 2018 tzhcced 24 18 may 2018
The application is properly before the court under the cited provisions, there are no facts warranting denial of bail, and the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail for the offence charged.
- Citation
- hamisi juma vs republic 2018 tzhcced 24 18 may 2018
- Parties
- Applicant: Hamisi Juma; Respondent: The Republic
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application
- Outcome
- Bail granted
- Legal Topics
- Bail, Narcotic Drugs, Jurisdiction
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Hamisi Juma
Applicant
The Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Bail Application / Ruling on Bail Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to bail for the offence of unlawful possession of narcotic drugs involving 283.3 grams of cannabis sativa
- 2 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail in this matter
Ratio Decidendi
The application is properly before the court under the cited provisions, there are no facts warranting denial of bail, and the High Court has jurisdiction to grant bail for the offence charged.
Court Disposition
Bail granted
Orders
- Applicant to execute bail bond of Tshs. 5,000,000
- Applicant to furnish two reliable sureties, residents of Dodoma Region, each to sign bond of Tshs. 2,000,000
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment