hamis kizenga vs lithar kanyanga others 2022 tzhclandd 12246 31 august 2022
The appeal was filed within the prescribed period after excluding the time required to obtain certified copies of judgment and decree, as mandated by section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act. The preliminary objection is without merit.
- Citation
- hamis kizenga vs lithar kanyanga others 2022 tzhclandd 12246 31 august 2022
- Parties
- Appellant: Hamisi Kizenga; 1st Respondent: Lithar Kanyanga; 2nd Respondent: Maneno Mashaka; 3rd Respondent: Lekani Kondowe
- Court
- TANZLII
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Judgment Date
- 31 August 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- preliminary objection dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Limitation of Actions, Appeals, Computation of Time
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamisi Kizenga
Appellant
Lithar Kanyanga
1st Respondent
Maneno Mashaka
2nd Respondent
Lekani Kondowe
3rd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Appeal / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appeal is time-barred under section 41(2) of the Land Disputes Courts Act and section 3 of the Law of Limitation Act
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was filed within the prescribed period after excluding the time required to obtain certified copies of judgment and decree, as mandated by section 19(2) of the Law of Limitation Act. The preliminary objection is without merit.
Court Disposition
preliminary objection dismissed
Orders
- preliminary objection dismissed with costs
- matter to proceed on merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment