hamis masanja vs republic 2013 tzca 350 18 june 2013

hamis masanja vs republic 2013 tzca 350 18 june 2013

The conviction could not be sustained because the evidence of the victim, a child of tender age, was admitted without a voire dire examination and thus expunged; the remaining evidence was hearsay and insufficient to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt.

Citation
hamis masanja vs republic 2013 tzca 350 18 june 2013
Parties
Appellant: Hamisi Masanja; Respondent: The Republic
Court
TZCA
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
18 June 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.
Legal Topics
Rape, Evidence of Child Witnesses, Voire Dire Examination, Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases
Source Language
English

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hamisi Masanja

Appellant

The Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Second Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the evidence of a child of tender age was properly admitted without a voire dire examination
  2. 2 Whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for rape after expunging the victim's testimony

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction could not be sustained because the evidence of the victim, a child of tender age, was admitted without a voire dire examination and thus expunged; the remaining evidence was hearsay and insufficient to prove rape beyond reasonable doubt.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; sentence set aside; appellant to be released unless otherwise lawfully held.

Orders

  • Conviction of Hamisi Masanja quashed
  • Sentence of thirty (30) years imprisonment set aside