hamis said chambuso vs enterpreneurs financial centre efc 3 othhers 2023 tzhclandd 15763 31 march 2023

hamis said chambuso vs enterpreneurs financial centre efc 3 othhers 2023 tzhclandd 15763 31 march 2023

Applicant failed to provide sufficient and relevant reasons to justify the delay of almost two years in filing the appeal; mere narration of events between parties is irrelevant to the requirement of showing good cause for extension of time.

Citation
hamis said chambuso vs enterpreneurs financial centre efc 3 othhers 2023 tzhclandd 15763 31 march 2023
Parties
Applicant: Hamisi Said Chambuso; 1st Respondent: Entrepreneurs Financial Centre (efc); 2nd Respondent: Alex Shayo; 3rd Respondent: Yono Auction Mart & Auction Mart Court Brokers; 4th Respondent: Sensitive Auction Mart
Court
TANZLII
Jurisdiction
Tanzania
Judgment Date
31 March 2023
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Appeals, Mortgage, Loan Default, Tribunal Decisions
Source Language
English
Land Law Civil Procedure Extension of Time Appeals Mortgage Loan Default Tribunal Decisions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hamisi Said Chambuso

Applicant

Entrepreneurs Financial Centre (efc)

1st Respondent

Alex Shayo

2nd Respondent

Yono Auction Mart & Auction Mart Court Brokers

3rd Respondent

Sensitive Auction Mart

4th Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated sufficient good cause for extension of time to file an appeal out of time

Ratio Decidendi

Applicant failed to provide sufficient and relevant reasons to justify the delay of almost two years in filing the appeal; mere narration of events between parties is irrelevant to the requirement of showing good cause for extension of time.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed with no order as to costs