hamisi saidi segule vs acer petroleum t ltd 2022 tzhclandd 12328 19 september 2022
- Citation
- hamisi saidi segule vs acer petroleum t ltd 2022 tzhclandd 12328 19 september 2022
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- Tanzania
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 19 September 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction; Settlement Recorded
- Language
- English
More details
- Court
- TANZLII
- Decision
- 19 September 2022
- Posture
- Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction; Settlement Recorded
- Language
- English
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The application is marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed by the parties, as there is no opposition and both parties have agreed to settle.
Court disposition
Application marked settled out of court
02
Material facts
Parties
Hamisi Said Segule
Applicant Counsel: Mr. Gwamaka MwalkuglleAcer Petroleum (T) Limited
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction; Settlement Recorded
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether to grant an injunction restraining the respondent from developing the disputed property pending suit
- 02
Whether the matter should be marked settled based on the deed of settlement
Party arguments
- Applicant
- Applicant sought an injunction to restrain the respondent from developing the property pending the intended suit, alleging unlawful holding of title by the respondent.
- Respondent
- No counter affidavit filed; respondent signed the deed of settlement agreeing to settle the matter out of court.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
General civil procedure principles; referenced in ruling
Court may record settlement reached by parties as final order if no justifiable reason to deny it.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The application is marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed by the parties, as there is no opposition and both parties have agreed to settle.
Court disposition
Application marked settled out of court
Source and reliance status
TANZLII · 19 September 2022
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
TANZLII
Judgment· 19 September 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)
AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC LAND APPLICATION NO.477 OF 2022
HAMISI SAID SEGULE APPLICANT
VERSUS ACER PETROLEUM (T) LIMITED RESPONDENT Date oflast order: 19/09/2022 Date ofRuling: 19/09/2022 RULING. I. ARUFANI,J The applicant filed in this court the present application under certificate of extreme urgency against the respondent seeking for orders of injunctions to restrain the respondent their agents, workmen servants and my persons acting under their authority from erecting or constructing or carrying any form of development on the property known as P16697 part of which the applicant's property, that is unlawfully held under a Certificate of Title in the name of ACER PETROLEUM (T) LIMITED, in the pendency of the intended suit upon the lapse of the 90 days' notice of intention to sue the Government. The applicant is also praying in alternative the court be pleased to make finding that there exist good cause for granting orders being sought therein and the cots of the application. The appliGation was made under Sections 68(c) and (e)and 95, and Order XXXVII Rule 1 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R. E 2019 AND Section 2(3) of the Judicature and Application of laws Act, Cap 358 R. E 2019 and is supported by the affidavit affirmed by the applicant and there Is no counter affidavit filed by the respondent. On 7"^ September, 2022 the parties filed In this court a deed of settlement of the matter and when the matter called today 19"^ September, 2022 the counsel for
the applicant, Mr. Gwamaka Mwalkuglle, Advocate who was present in the court alone told the court the parties have settled the matter out of the court and prayed the court to Issue the necessary orders. After going through the deed of settlement filed in this court on 7"^ September, 2022 the court has found the parties have agreed to settle the matter out of court on the terms and conditions stated In the deed of settlement filed In the court by the parties. After seeing the respondent has not filed counter affidavit In the court to oppose the application but they have signed the deed of settlement with the applicant as appearing In the deed of settlement the court has failed to see any justifiable reason which Is making It to deny to record the settlement reached by the parties as the final order for determination and finallzation of the present application. In the premises the application is hereby marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed in the court by the parties. It is so ordered. Dated atfiar es Salaam this 19'^ day of September, 2022 -coURr 2/^ o 1. Arufani t- ★
JUDGE ★ 19/09/2022
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.