Download PDF

Tanzania Judgment

TANZLII

hamisi saidi segule vs acer petroleum t ltd 2022 tzhclandd 12328 19 september 2022

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The application is marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed by the parties, as there is no opposition and both parties have agreed to settle.

Court disposition

Application marked settled out of court

02

Material facts

Parties

Hamisi Said Segule

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Gwamaka Mwalkuglle

Acer Petroleum (T) Limited

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Miscellaneous Land Application / Ruling on Application for Injunction; Settlement Recorded

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
Applicant sought an injunction to restrain the respondent from developing the property pending the intended suit, alleging unlawful holding of title by the respondent.
Respondent
No counter affidavit filed; respondent signed the deed of settlement agreeing to settle the matter out of court.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    General civil procedure principles; referenced in ruling

    Court may record settlement reached by parties as final order if no justifiable reason to deny it.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The application is marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed by the parties, as there is no opposition and both parties have agreed to settle.

Court disposition

Application marked settled out of court

Source and reliance status

TANZLII · 19 September 2022

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

TANZLII

Judgment· 19 September 2022

hamisi saidi segule vs acer petroleum t ltd 2022 tzhclandd 12328 19 september 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA (LAND DIVISION)

AT DAR ES SALAAM MISC LAND APPLICATION NO.477 OF 2022

HAMISI SAID SEGULE APPLICANT

VERSUS ACER PETROLEUM (T) LIMITED RESPONDENT Date oflast order: 19/09/2022 Date ofRuling: 19/09/2022 RULING. I. ARUFANI,J The applicant filed in this court the present application under certificate of extreme urgency against the respondent seeking for orders of injunctions to restrain the respondent their agents, workmen servants and my persons acting under their authority from erecting or constructing or carrying any form of development on the property known as P16697 part of which the applicant's property, that is unlawfully held under a Certificate of Title in the name of ACER PETROLEUM (T) LIMITED, in the pendency of the intended suit upon the lapse of the 90 days' notice of intention to sue the Government. The applicant is also praying in alternative the court be pleased to make finding that there exist good cause for granting orders being sought therein and the cots of the application. The appliGation was made under Sections 68(c) and (e)and 95, and Order XXXVII Rule 1 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R. E 2019 AND Section 2(3) of the Judicature and Application of laws Act, Cap 358 R. E 2019 and is supported by the affidavit affirmed by the applicant and there Is no counter affidavit filed by the respondent. On 7"^ September, 2022 the parties filed In this court a deed of settlement of the matter and when the matter called today 19"^ September, 2022 the counsel for

the applicant, Mr. Gwamaka Mwalkuglle, Advocate who was present in the court alone told the court the parties have settled the matter out of the court and prayed the court to Issue the necessary orders. After going through the deed of settlement filed in this court on 7"^ September, 2022 the court has found the parties have agreed to settle the matter out of court on the terms and conditions stated In the deed of settlement filed In the court by the parties. After seeing the respondent has not filed counter affidavit In the court to oppose the application but they have signed the deed of settlement with the applicant as appearing In the deed of settlement the court has failed to see any justifiable reason which Is making It to deny to record the settlement reached by the parties as the final order for determination and finallzation of the present application. In the premises the application is hereby marked settled out of court on the terms and conditions set out in the deed of settlement filed in the court by the parties. It is so ordered. Dated atfiar es Salaam this 19'^ day of September, 2022 -coURr 2/^ o 1. Arufani t- ★

JUDGE ★ 19/09/2022

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Sections 68(c) and (e) and 95, Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Order XXXVII Rule 1(a), Civil Procedure Code, Cap 33 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Section 2(3), Judicature and Application of Laws Act, Cap 358 R.E 2019

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.